My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-25 SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
06-23-25 SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2025 10:42:27 AM
Creation date
7/30/2025 7:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JUNE 23, 2025 13 <br />Fisher said they have had some good conversations with the Rice Creek Watershed and the Karth <br />Lake District board regarding the pump system improvements. They can coordinate directly with <br />the DNR regarding available options. There is a three tiered approach of different options for <br />consideration. He said Karth Lake is an isolated lake with no emergency overflow on the lake. If <br />nothing is done it will flood, over time. The City has a permit to pump out the lake. There is a <br />force main that runs down to Cummings Drive and outlets into the storm sewer system. It <br />operates at a two -foot bounce level. When it reaches a certain level, a manual pump is deployed <br />that is connected to the electrical system. They pump it down about two feet and remove the <br />pump. That process needs to be repeated every time the water rises. The Karth Lake Improvement <br />District is requesting a six-inch bounce level vs. two -feet. That would help with erosion around <br />the banks and from a recreation standpoint. The existing system is manually deployed. City Staff <br />has to watch water levels to know when to deploy it and then have to manually remove the pump <br />when the water levels reach the desired depth. They evaluated three options. The first option is to <br />maintain the existing deployable pump but add a water logger device that would be anchored by a <br />buoy which would monitor the lake level. It gives live readings of the lake levels but that can be <br />impacted by wave levels and wind. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said that is essentially how we act today <br />because the Karth Lake Improvement District is very active. This would just be automated so we <br />get signals when the water rises. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson said you still have to manually deploy it. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson remembers Council being interested in it being as automated as <br />possible. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen clarified that they don't deploy it every <br />time. It's on a floating device. We have to manually go down there and turn it on and off. <br />Fisher said the second option is to use the existing pump but add a reinforced concrete structure <br />that would go into the ground and the structure would be connected by a reinforced concrete pipe <br />culvert directly to the lake. They would need to isolate the area for construction. The culvert <br />would be underwater and the structure mimics the level of the lake. That would mitigate wave and <br />wind impact. The pump would be set in there and we would automate that pump. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how old the pump is. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said this is only a handful of years old and is <br />in pretty good condition. <br />Fisher said the third option is a complete lift station. You would have multiple structures <br />connected. It would be connected to the lake, like in option two, but there would be complete <br />control panel, the pump, the logging device and all of the equipment. This option would likely <br />include replacement of the pumps to fit the project better for the long term. The final piece, if the <br />pumps are upgraded, we would need to explore how that impacts the pump curves associated with <br />the existing the forcemain. The forcemain is in good condition. As long as we can maintain the <br />desired water levels there's no need to replace it. If this option is chosen the 6" forcemain may <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.