My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-25 SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
06-23-25 SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2025 10:42:27 AM
Creation date
7/30/2025 7:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JUNE 23, 2025 16 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson said she doesn't think there is a lot of appetite for that. If we did, it <br />would have to be a much bigger discussion before they could decide. She thinks we are going to <br />hold on that. She'd be fine if we received bids on it to see what the cost is. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said it is a maintenance item and the risk is <br />very low, if we decide to pass on it. Now that we do have sediment control devices, we maintain <br />them annually, if not bi-annually, if time allows. They are wide open. He thinks the sediment <br />control devices are very effective and with the maintenance program we are able to not add <br />sediment to the lake. <br />Councilmember Weber assumed the sediment depth testing was done only by the lake inlets. <br />Fisher confirmed. <br />Councilmember Weber said we don't know if those levels are uniform. He thinks ahead of any <br />discussion on City-wide policy on dredging, it would be important to investigate the sediment <br />depths of the entire lake. <br />Councilmember Holden said she would like to eliminate the alternate option. <br />Councilmember Weber agrees. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson said she would prefer the second option for the pump improvements. <br />The first option doesn't go far enough and the third option is too expensive. <br />Councilmember Weber agrees. <br />Councilmember Holden agrees with the second option. She thinks the cost should be split <br />between the City and the Karth Lake District. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the watershed has shown some serious <br />interest in partnering with the City on the pumping operations. They haven't said exactly what <br />they would be willing to fund but they are open to discussion. We can propose this to them. Once <br />we understand what their funding would be, we could bring it back to Council. <br />Councilmember Weber said if they are willing to discuss the pumping, maybe they would do the <br />lift station. <br />Fisher said the watershed asked us to bring a proposal to them, outlining what the City wants. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen pointed out the memo states that Staff is <br />recommending option two but would recommend exploring option three to see if the watershed <br />may pay for it. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson agrees with Staff recommendation. She said go with option two and <br />explore other options, as discussed. <br />D. Zoning Update <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.