My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-25 SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
06-23-25 SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2025 10:42:27 AM
Creation date
7/30/2025 7:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JUNE 23, 2025 3 <br />Baxter shared a graphic showing the location of Building 14 in the upper and west corner of their <br />campus. The property lines of the neighboring homes are less than 100 feet away. Boston <br />Scientific raised the question if something can be done to reduce all of the sources of the noise <br />complaints from neighbors. The goal was to get 5 decibels reduction for the mechanical <br />equipment sources. He thinks a significant amount of noise complaints come from the loading <br />dock area on the north side. That is where deliveries are brought in. The garbage is collected <br />there. It's the place for snow plow activity in the winter. It isn't just the engine noise; it's also the <br />beeping when trucks back up. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Monson asked other than the trucks, where is the equipment located that makes <br />noise. <br />Baxter said there is mechanical equipment on the rooftop. There are some sources on the side of <br />the building, as well. <br />Councilmember Holden said that is a problem for the neighborhood. She pointed out that Boston <br />Scientific are meeting the qualifications now. <br />Baxter confirmed that they are below requirements but they would like the noise levels to be <br />further away from the max limit. <br />Councilmember Weber said the tallest portion of the wall is further down the trail. He asked if <br />the wall will be tall enough on the north side to make an impactful difference. <br />Baxter outlined the topography of the site. He shared a graphic analyzing noise levels. The <br />requirement is they cannot be more than 60 dba during day hours and 50 dba at night. He outlined <br />what the graphic indicated for sound. <br />Councilmember Holden thinks it is louder in the winter. She wondered what time of the year <br />this data was collected. <br />Baxter said these are theoretical calculations, rather than actual measured noise levels. It may <br />sound louder in the winter because it is quieter outside. At this close of distance there probably <br />isn't that big of a difference in the mechanical noise created on the roof regardless of the season. <br />He described how the wall will create an acoustical shadow behind the wall. He said the source of <br />the noise from the roof is from mechanical equipment. Many of them will be replaced in the near <br />future as part of the decarbonization. They will be replacing gas -fired equipment on the roof top <br />and changing of some boilers inside the building to electric. The new units will mostly be in the <br />same location but the newer equipment will have better decibel level performance. Those <br />replacements are already being planned, in advance of this wall. <br />Larson said this includes some of those changes that might happen. We added sources to this <br />graphic that do not exist today. <br />Baxter said when doing an engineering analysis, we want to know what the worst case scenario is <br />and work from there. He explained that the length of the wall on the northern end wouldn't see <br />any added benefit by extending it. They would have preferred to extend it longer in the other <br />direction but a pond and wetland prevent that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.