Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />February 22, 1993 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski said that all the feedback she <br />heard was positive and she hopes the event can take place <br />again. <br /> <br />Mayor Sather thanked Buckley for his report. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 93-13 REGARDING <br />JOINT PUBLIC FACILITIES <br /> <br />Administrator Person explained that proposed Resolution No. <br />93-13 has been drafted to represent Arden Hills' interest in <br />sharing the Twin cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) <br />property as a joint public facility with Ramsey County, the <br />state of Minnesota and other public agencies. <br /> <br />She added that Ramsey County will be attending a National <br />Association of Counties Meeting within the next few days <br />which County officials are planning to present to <br />Congressional District Representatives a packet of <br />information regarding this matter, including resolutions of <br />support from interested parties. <br /> <br />Mayor Sather stated he has been in contact with Ramsey <br />County staff and learned that the information packet being <br />compiled includes general information, resolutions of <br />support, and collateral information which was discussed in <br />joint meetings. He endorsed this effort and recommended <br />adoption of Resolution 93-13. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to adopt <br />Resolution 93-13 Regarding Joint Public Facilities That <br />Would Be Shared With the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey <br />County, the State of Minnesota, and other Public <br />Agencies. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />Councilmember Probst asked if Resolution 93-13 makes <br />reference to the description of the property. Administrator <br />Person stated that property description is planned to be <br />included in the information packet that Ramsey County will <br />be presenting to the Congressional District Representatives. <br /> <br />SECTION 125 PRE-TAX <br />DEDUCTION CORRECTION <br /> <br />City Accountant Post reported that, during computer <br />conversion, staff has discovered an erroneous payroll <br />process has been used since 1989 in the treatment of pre-tax <br />dependent health deduction. He explained that since 1989, <br />payroll has been treating some dependent health deductions <br />as if an approved "cafeteria (Section 125) plan" was in <br />place, when in fact, such a plan was not approved. <br />