Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />t. \! <br /> <br />that it would be July 1 - approximately - that initial <br />would begin. what does the completion date look like? <br />do have another question. <br /> <br />work <br />Then I <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: As we envision the project at this time, we <br />would anticipate somewhere after the first of July that con- <br />struction would start. I don't believe it's reasonable to <br />expect that the entire project would be built in the year 1983. <br />It's also been our experience that even if it could be done, <br />we probably wouldn't put the final wear course on until it had <br />gone through one winter and put it on in 1984 anyway. Also, <br />there will be certain tree planting, sod and this type of thing, <br />which has to go through one growing season before it's accepted. <br />Realistically, we're looking at a project that may start in <br />July and may not be completed until August or September of <br />the following year. <br /> <br />One thing that we need to keep in mind is that the County <br />will not allow them to take up any bituminous surfacing that <br />they won't get a bituminous driving surface restored to by <br />winter. It's doubtful that the contractor, then, would come in <br />and tear the whole thing up under those obligations. What I'm <br />trying to say is that maybe the piece from G-2 north - for <br />instance - could be the only thing that got built in 1983. The <br />other part might not get touched.' Or, vice-versa, maybe the <br />south piece or some other piece would get constructed, which <br />would not mean the entire project would get built, but some <br />portion of it. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />It's very, very difficult, until you have a contract and <br />a contractor, to identify which piece will be torn up when. <br />The overall project could well go a year, but not in front of <br />anyone particular location. <br /> <br />MR. LIPPERT: <br />to the Council, so <br />it. <br /> <br />My second question may not be of interest <br />maybe I could talk to you afterwards about <br /> <br />MR. ANDY HOLEWA: Mr. Leonard, do you plan on putting any <br />trees or shrubs between the pathway and the property owner's <br />line - between 96 and Pleasant Circle? <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: Yes and no. We have dealt with a couple <br />of property owners where they presently have trees and, in <br />developing the section that they seem to favor - that is, a <br />boulevard adjacent to the path on their side and then slope <br />down into their yard - would require picking up or trans- <br />planting or replacing their trees. So in that area, we have <br />proposed to either replace trees. and/or transplant what is <br />there. Some of those trees, when they're transplanted, will <br />be - for all practical purposes - right on the property line, <br />but probably not out in the public right-of-way. As we go <br />north of Pleasant Circle, the present plan does not call for <br />any trees to be scattered out through that wide right-of~way <br />beyond the path. <br /> <br />-22- <br />