My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
08-25-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 4:46:10 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 4:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JULY 28, 2025 10 <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said it will be. It's related to the TCAAP <br />development. <br />Mayor Grant asked when we can start assessing that back. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said that is the question we need to answer. <br />Mayor Grant said it's a good question. He has heard comments about what people want. <br />Councilmember Weber made comments about a loader and if we can rent one since it's only used <br />10 hours a year. Is that really what people want? There are areas in our budget we want to take a <br />look at. <br />Councilmember Monson said she wants to talk about that loader at some point. She is adding the <br />Hamline Trail at $160,000, the hard court are $450,000, the shelters at the parks are $170,000 and <br />the Snelling and Trident is $450,000. She asked what the other trails are. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the County Road E is not happening <br />next year. Highway 51 is 100% MnDOT. <br />Councilmember Monson said adding up those park expenses is about $1.2 million. She <br />wondered if we wanted to slice and dice a bond on that side vs. PMP. She is open to split some of <br />the park items off for the bond. She is ready to discuss the case loader. <br />Councilmember Weber said the PIR Fund went five years with no increase. It didn't follow <br />inflation, it wasn't considered in years where there was low inflation. That's what he was <br />referring to. He isn't saying the City hasn't planned ahead, entirely. He's only talking about the <br />PIR and other funds that didn't follow inflationary trends. He believes there is a limit to how <br />much you can use ICWC or there is a lot of competition for use of that group. <br />Councilmember Holden said you have better odds once you're in the pool. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we typically budget for 160 hours of <br />work for ICWC. Last year there was difficulty scheduling them and it's even worse this year. <br />There have been managerial changes. <br />Public Works Superintendent Frid confirmed there have been a number of challenges. One was <br />that they said Stillwater Prison was closing. The contact he had that would do the scheduling has <br />moved on to another position. There is someone else in that role and he handles things differently. <br />There aren't as many corrections officers. We are contracted for their overtime pool, on <br />weekends. A corrections officer runs their crew and they have to have to have someone volunteer <br />to work overtime. If we don't have corrections officers volunteer for those shifts, we can't fill <br />weekends. <br />Councilmember Weber said that was his point. We can't count on utilizing those. There are <br />limits. His comments about the trunk line watermain and utilities at Rice Creek Commons wasn't <br />intended to confuse what the City is responsible for and what the developers will pay for. It all <br />counts toward the same $10 million bonding. We have to pay for those despite the fact that we are <br />going to go get that money back. We may have to choose between what we want to bond for, if <br />we decide to bond sooner than 2030. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.