My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
08-25-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 4:46:10 PM
Creation date
8/21/2025 4:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JULY 28, 2025 14 <br />Mayor Grant said using the 590 we would need to dump 5 bucketfuls to fill a truck. <br />Public Works Superintendent Frid confirmed. <br />Mayor Grant said the 590 and the loader are two of the older pieces of equipment. He said why <br />buy two pieces of equipment. If a truck holds five yards and a 590 holds one yard and you dump <br />five bucketfuls into the truck. It may take a few extra minutes but not that long when you're <br />looking at $300,000. The 590 will need to be replaced, too. Why have two pieces of equipment to <br />front end load when you know one of the front end loaders is used 10 hours a year. He doesn't <br />know if we need two loaders. There are so many needs on the list. He'd like to see us keep the <br />levy down as much as we can. Maybe we ease the burden in 2026 and pass it to 2027. <br />Councilmember Monson said this case loader is very expensive. What we use it for is important <br />but isn't used very frequently. We have to find a solution where we don't have to purchase one. <br />Or we bundle it in 2029 and bond for it with everything else. It isn't palatable. She would like <br />Staff to come up with a better plan to consider. We've had this conversation for 2025, we're <br />talking about in now for 2026 and we're talking about pushing it to 2027. We'll have the same <br />conversation next year. <br />Councilmember Holden said when talking about bonding. It costs us $4 million to bond $3 <br />million. She asked if local sales taxes are off the table? <br />Finance Director Yang doesn't think it's been lifted. <br />Councilmember Holden knew it was introduced but she didn't know where that was. Maybe we <br />increase the Franchise Fee by a quarter. <br />Mayor Grant said that is contractual for 15 years. <br />Finance Director Yang said you have the ability to change those fees. <br />Councilmember Holden said Shoreview did it last year. They raised it like fifty cents. Then we <br />can have real money instead of paying so much debt that we are losing. She said Councilmember <br />Weber keeps throwing out Cannabis. We lose money with bonding. If we can get money from a <br />different source and collect interest, we have that money to spend. <br />Mayor Grant said we learned from doing the fire station at 15 year bonding, $3 million costs us <br />$4 million. <br />Councilmember Monson clarified, it is $1 million dollars in interest. It is $4 million paid in <br />total, on $3 million borrowed. <br />Mayor Grant confirmed. A $3 million bond for 15 years will cost us $4 million total. Looking at <br />the $300,000 loader is I tenth of that. <br />Discussion ensued regarding bonding for the case loader. <br />Councilmember Weber agrees with Councilmember Monson. He said it is the kind of machine <br />you run into the ground. The resale value on it doesn't mean much if you're selling a $300,000 <br />piece of equipment for $25,000 at the end. The maintenance costs on it are next to nothing. We <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.