Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . ... <br /> Kinutes of Regular Council Neeting <br /> October 25, 1982 <br /> Page Three <br /> Council concurred that Land O'Lakes submit a revised landscape <br /> plan for Council's consideration: Thompson said the plan will be <br /> . comp Ie ted in a coup Ie of weeks for Council's review. <br /> Emerald Inn <br /> Council was referred to report of Landscape Inspection Ervin Oelke <br /> (10-10-82) . McNiesh reported that Emerald Inn has not received <br /> the landscape report. <br /> Council deferred action pending Emerald Innis comments relative <br /> to the report and recommended stock replacement. <br /> . Public Works Committee Recommendations: <br /> Use of Black Diamond and 1983 S t re e t Sweeping <br /> Council was referred to recommendations of Public Works Commi t tee <br /> (Minutes of Oct. 18th) , memo from Public Wo rks Superintendent <br /> Johansen (10-20-82) and to memo from McNiesh (10-1-82) relative <br /> citizen input re black diamond etc. <br /> After discussion, Hicks moved that Council approve the recommen- <br /> dations of the Public Works Committee that black diamond be used <br /> for s t re e t sanding purposes and that early s t re e t sweeping be <br /> awarded' to a private contractor this season; because of the econ- <br /> omy situation. Motion was seconded by Mul cahy. <br /> In further discussion, it was queried whether black diamond could <br /> be crushed finer. Concern was exp res s ed about piling of black <br /> diamond, a f te r it is swept from the streetst because of its long <br /> term factor; also of concern was the fact that black diamond col- <br /> le c t s in driveways and gutters and remains all year. <br /> Original motion did not carry (NcAllister voting in favor; Hicks, <br /> Johnson, Mulcahy, Woodburn voting in opposition). (1-4). <br /> Hicks moved that, for the t 82 - , 83 season J Arden Hills use salt/ <br /> sand for icy streets and contract with New Brigh ton for spring <br /> !treet sweeping. Motion was seconded by Johnson and carried. <br /> (Hicks, Mulcahy, Johnson, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion; <br /> McAllis r.e r voting in opposition 4-1) . <br /> Preliminary Discussion - Widening Lexington Avenue North of <br /> Con trol D~ <br /> It was reported by Woodburn that Co un ty Engineer Weltzin has been <br /> req ues ted by Shoreview to include the s tu dy of the upgrading of <br /> Lexington Avenue from the present pro j e c t to County Road J in <br /> next year's budget, ins te ad of the upgrading of Co un t y Road J <br /> which is currently proposed for 1983. Woodburn reported that <br /> Weltzin would like encouragement from Arden Hills, as well as <br /> Shoreview, in order to plan for federal funding of the project. <br /> In discussion, it was no te d that proposed plan s for the Lexington <br /> Ave. upgrading are unknown at this time. Some eonce rns expressed <br /> were the possible need for additional righ t-of-way, increased <br /> . speed and traffic if road is widened, cos t to the Ci ty and/or'. <br /> property owners. Council WflS re fe rre.d to a previous Resolution <br /> (No. 76-29) Haking Recommendations to Ramsey County for the Im- <br /> provement of Lexington Avenue from County Road "n" northward to <br /> County Road f1JlI. It was noted that the upgrade of Lexington may <br /> be necessary, but massive widening is not necessarily appropriate <br /> or desirable to accommodate the necessary travel 1 an e s and de- <br /> tached bikeways previously recommended. <br /> Council generally concurred that HcNiesh enclose Res. 76-25 wi th <br /> letter advising Ramsey County Engineer Weltzin that the Arden <br /> Hills Council recognizes that improvement of Lexington is needed, <br /> and Council is looking forward to a plan proposal. (4-1) <br /> (Mulcahy opposed). <br /> Tax Forfeited Lan ds - Resolution Nos. 82-55, 82 - 5 6 and 82-77 <br /> Council was referred to map indicating tax forfeited lands in <br /> Arden Hi lIs, and to McNiesh's memo of 10-22-82, reporting that the <br /> -3- <br />