Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />August 9, 1982 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Royal Hills MaIntenance Letter of Credit <br /> <br />Council was referred to McNlesh's memo of August 6th relative to Performance and <br />Maintenance Bonds for grading of roads In Royal Hil Is and Arden Oaks Plats. <br /> <br />In discussion, Christoffersen said he sees no reason for a maintenance bond once <br />Royal HII Is Subdivision and road grade Is accepted; there Is no long term main- <br />tenance needed; feels It is superfluous for Royal Hills, ChrIstoffersen said the <br />Arden Oaks situation Is quite different because It contains additional grading <br />for pond lng, etc. <br /> <br />After discussion, Johnson moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council waive the <br />ment Agreement requirement of a maintenance bond for Royal HII Is grading, <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Develop- <br />Motion <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Lynden noted that the Performance Bond can be released by the Clerk Administrator <br />after acceptance of the developer's grading by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Resolution to Change Name of Wesley Avenue <br /> <br />McNlesh reported that Frank Kvidera, Acting Ramsey County Surveyor, requests a <br />Resolution changing the name of Wesley Avenue to Arden Oaks Drive (between County <br />Road E and the Arden Oaks plat), It was explained that there are no existing <br />addresses on Wesley Avenue; Wesley Avenue, as it exists, Is not a continuation <br />of an existing street In adjohllng areas. <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that the Council authorize the City Attorney to <br />prepare the appropriate 'resolution, changing the name of Wesley Avenue to Arden <br />Oaks Drive, from County Road E to the Arden Oaks plat. Motion. carried unanimously <br />( 5-0 l. <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN <br /> <br />1982 Sealcoatlnq Contract Bids <br /> <br />Council was referred to bid tabulation of three bids received on August 5th for <br />1982 bituminous sealcoating, Christoffersen said the EngIneer's estimate was $38,000; <br />recommends acceptance of the low bid of $36,820.20 by All ied Blacktop. <br /> <br />In discussion, It was noted that $28,000 was budgeted for the 1982 sealcoatlng pro- <br />ject; acceptance of the low bid will be $8,800 over the budget. One alternative <br />suggested was to reduce the size of the project. Christoffersen explained that the <br />bid Is based on quantities; streets In 1982 project are wider than those In the 1981 <br />project, consequently, even though the miles of streets are approximately the same, <br />there Is a difference in the quantitIes needed to complete the project. .. <br /> <br />McNlesh noted that the 1982 General Fund is about $14,000 under the budgeted amount; <br />General Fund could probably absorb the difference between the actual and budgeted <br />amount for sealcoatlng. <br /> <br />After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by Johnson, that Council accept <br />and award the contract to AI lied Blacktop In the amount of $36,820.20. <br />carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />the low bid <br />Motion <br /> <br />Improvement No. ST-81-2, Storm Dralnaqe - Payment No.8, Lamettl & Sons, Inc. <br /> <br />Council was referred to Christoffersen's letter of August 4, 1982 relative to <br />& Sons' request for a reduction of retalnage from 5% to 2% for Payment No.8, <br />Lexington Avenue/I-694 St9rm Drainage Improvement, ST-81-2. <br /> <br />Christoffersen said he anticipates the project will be completed within two weeks; <br />at 2%, the balance wll I be about $14,785, which Is sufficient retalnage for com- <br />pletion of the project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Lametti <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Johnson, that Councl I accept the project as SUbstantIally <br />complete and authorize reduction of retalnage to 2%. Motion carried unanimously (5-0), <br /> <br />-2- <br />