Laserfiche WebLink
CITY FINANCES <br /> 2010 Property Tax Report <br /> This year's report shows the continuing toll the weak housing market and economic recession have taken <br /> on cities. In addition to declines in residential homestead market value and total city market value, cities <br /> again had to deal with state aid and credit reimbursement cuts and levy limits. <br /> By Rachel Walker and Lena Gould <br /> his,the League of Minnesota ■ Limited market value sunsets.The residential homestead property,non- <br /> Cities' 18th consecutive property limited market value (LMV) program, homestead residential property (e.g., <br /> tax report,provides an update on which protected homeowners against apartments,student housing),and <br /> a few key policy issues related to <br /> the property tax system.It also <br /> large increases in assessed value,was commercial-industrial property,all <br /> allowed to sunset in 2009.Starting decreased in market value over the <br /> discusses trends in city property with taxes payable in 2010,there will last year(see Figure 1). <br /> tax in terms of both market value no longer be restrictions on assessed Residential homestead property <br /> and tax capacity. • <br /> value increases. showed a decline in 2009,but this is the <br /> first time in the history of this report that <br /> Things to note for taxes payable in 2010 Market value trends non-homestead residential and commer- <br /> •Aid and credit reimbursement cuts. The slowdown in market value growth cial-industrial values shrank compared to <br /> The 2009 legislative session ended described in the last two reports has the prior year.This suggests that assessed <br /> 0 without an agreement on how to become much more pronounced.Total values are finally beginning to catch up <br /> solve the then$2.7 billion state market value for cities overall decreased to changes in the housing market,a <br /> budget deficit.In July 2009,Gov. 3 percent from 2009 to 2010.Looking trend that will likely continue.Assess- <br /> Pawlenty used his unallotment power at individual categories of property, ments for taxes payable in 2010 were <br /> to reduce appropriations to van- completed by Jan.2,2009.Both agri- <br /> ous state programs,including both cultural and other property(e.g.,cab- <br /> the 2009 and 2010 payments of local Included with this report: ins,bed and breakfasts,certain marinas) <br /> government aid(LGA) and mar- • The 2010 Property Tax Data Table and grew in value compared to 2009.Agri- <br /> ket value homestead credit (MVHC) Definitions—see pages 7-27: cultural market value grew at a faster rate <br /> reimbursement.For the two-year • Comparative data by economic devel- compared to last year while other kinds <br /> period,$192.5 million was cut from opment region and by city population of property market value grew slower <br /> LGA and MVHC reimbursement category—see the Special Supplement than from 2008 to 2009. <br /> A lawsuit was filed chat- insert. <br /> payments. • Are ort on the decline of cityA closer look at the change in home- <br /> lenging the governor's use of unal- pstead residential market value reveals <br /> lotment authorityThe Minnesota revenues--see the Special Supplement <br /> insert(back page). differences based on city size and loca- <br /> Supreme Court ultimately ruled in tion.When looking at the changes by <br /> early May 2010 that Gov.Pawlenty Additional resources available on the population size,the share of cities that <br /> did exceed his budget unallotment League website: lost value from 2009 to 2010 increases <br /> authority.The Legislature convened a • A city-by-city breakdown of total tax as population does.Almost nine in 10 <br /> special session and ratified the bulk of capacity and total market value by cities with populations over 10,000 lost <br /> the unallotments,including those to property type. homestead value while just 46 percent <br /> • The Property Tax Calculator,an <br /> LGA and MVHC reimbursement. interactive web tool allows users of cities with populations under 300 saw <br /> • Levy limits. Despite strong legislative to compare estimated city and total a decline.Metro cities were more likely <br /> support to repeal levy limits,cities to see a decrease in value than Greater <br /> taxes owed on homestead and business <br /> with populations over 2,500 are sub- properties in different cities. Minnesota cities (94 percent vs.53 per- <br /> 1 jest to levy limits through 2011.The • Several background documents on vari- cent,respectively).The economic devel- <br /> levy limit inflation factor for pay- ous aspects of the 0property tax system. opment regions along the western edge <br /> able 2010 was just 0.83 percent.Cit- To access all this information,visit of the state had the largest shares of cit- <br /> ies could use special levies in 2010 to www.lmc.org/page/1/property-tax- ies experiencing growth in residential <br /> recoup lost 2008 and 2009 LGA and state funding-fiscal-issues jsp. homestead market value. <br /> MVHC reimbursements. 1 <br /> 4 M I N N E S O T A CITIES S E P T E M B E R-O C T O B E R 2010 <br />