Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — JULY 28, 2025 9 <br />Councilmember Weber recognizes the importance of the earlier statement to avoid bonding, if <br />possible. He also thinks it's important to give the residents what they want. If we can't afford to <br />do those things in this budget cycle we have to increase the levy appropriately so we can afford in <br />the future. Part of the reason we are where we are is because we're not adding to the potential. <br />Haven't been for some time. Some things are going to have to be pushed out. It is also important <br />to fit those things into a plan. How can we get them in the relatively near future? To the point of <br />bonding in 2030, he assume that is dependent on accepting the proposals outlined today. <br />Finance Director Yang confirmed. <br />Councilmember Weber said that is $350,000 increase to the PIR. He asked what the total <br />increase was for Public Safety. <br />Finance Director Yang said for Public Safety, it's just the $40,000. <br />Councilmember Weber said it's important to recognize that we can wait to bond, but it is <br />entirely dependent on raising the levy now. That is a pretty significant increase, across the board. <br />We have projects next year that seem like ideal candidates for bonding. He thinks the water work <br />we have to do for Rice Creek Commons next year is just the booster station and the work on the <br />north tower. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we have the trunk watermain upgrade <br />in Roseville. That is $900,000. <br />Councilmember Weber said that doesn't include any of the spine road trunk line. That will be <br />significant. It would be helpful to see an estimate on what that might be. If we're still talking <br />about potentially bonding soon, we need to look at what conflicts there might be. Next year does <br />seem like an ideal year, if we are moving forward with it. He would like to see options if next <br />year is a possibility, to try to soften the blow to residents this budget cycle. We would have to <br />commit to a stepped increase in the levy every year. It will be a significant number. <br />Councilmember Holden doesn't agree that we haven't done it in the past. We've added parks <br />and put park benches in the park, we've added trails. It is incorrect to say we haven't done <br />anything. We planned ahead for all of those items. She wondered what people Councilmember <br />Weber is talking about when he says "it's what people want"? As leaders, we have to take <br />responsibility and make sure, for the residents here that are living paycheck to paycheck, that we <br />aren't taxing them out of our community. What would it look like if we tax 15.9%? We can nit- <br />pick on every little thing. Maybe we start using ICWC more. We can hire them full-time. They <br />work five days a week, we only ever use them on the weekends. Maybe they can take care of the <br />City Hall. There may be other resources out there that we can utilize to reach our goal. <br />Mayor Grant thinks there is a difference in bonding for TCAAP trunk utilities. We can use the <br />429 process. Those bonds are covered by special assessments against the property. It won't be a <br />burden on us, if it's done that way. The upgrade to the Roseville watermain will be assessed back <br />to 429 special assessments. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said it, will be. It's related to the TCAAP <br />development. <br />