My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2011 Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Financial Planning and Analysis Committee (FPAC)
>
FPAC Packets
>
2011
>
04-12-2011 Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 3:56:12 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 3:54:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Financing <br /> (TIF). These varying tools have different long-term and short-term costs. <br /> TIF is one type of business subsidy. Importantly,TIF is a long-term subsidy with long-term cost and • <br /> benefit impacts that must be considered.This stands in contrast to some other forms of subsidies where <br /> the costs and impacts tend to be more short-term nature. <br /> The use of TIF can be thought about as having two decision layers. The first layer involves near term <br /> considerations: <br /> • Is the individual project acceptable under the City of Arden Hills business subsidy Policy? <br /> • Is the project financially feasible? <br /> • Is the TIF request currently affordable under the cities TIF Spending Guidelines? (see <br /> recommendation below) <br /> The second layer of considerations involves long-term considerations. <br /> • How does an individual project compare to the stated long-term goals and vision of Arden Hills? <br /> • How does the project compare to other potential long-term projects that are not yet identified? <br /> • How much long term leverage can the City obtain from a particular TIF project? <br /> Before a TIF project is approved,the project should be acceptable under both levels of consideration. <br /> Short-term consideration <br /> In general,the short-term considerations are not particularly difficult to assess. The first step is to match <br /> the project to the City's Business Subsidy criteria. The project must fall within the guidelines outlined. <br /> The second step is also relatively straightforward: the project must meet the financial thresholds for a TIF <br /> project. Finally,as a third step the project alone or in conjunction with other known projects cannot drive <br /> the city to exceed its total desired TIF limit. • <br /> These short-term considerations should be considered a threshold. A project must pass these tests to be <br /> considered for TIF funding. However,TIF funding is long-term,therefore the more important <br /> considerations are the long-term considerations. <br /> Long-term consideration <br /> By its nature TIF has long term impacts. The creation of a TIF District sidelines tax money for a period <br /> of time measured in years or even decades. Because only so much TIF is affordable for the City,at a <br /> very minimum any individual TIF District presents a long-term (lost)opportunity cost—a project today <br /> may preclude another different, potentially more beneficial,yet unknown project tomorrow. Therefore <br /> the TIF decision making process should be focused on long-term considerations. <br /> Recommendation for Creating a TIF Evaluation Process <br /> Develop TIF Spending Guidelines <br /> In order to better manage TIF financing decisions over the long term we recommend the City <br /> debate and set into policy a guideline on the total projected tax capacity of all tax increments in <br /> the City. Without a specific need we believe the City should limit the total projected tax capacity <br /> of all tax increments to not exceed %of the state average of 6.4%. This would mean a guideline <br /> for projected tax capacity for all tax increments in the City not to exceed 5%. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.