CC 02-26-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. I- . . . . . . . .. . I . . I . . .e . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 26. 1996 15 Mr. Post noted that St. Mary's has submitted renewal applications, the permit investigation fee and substantiation of trade area spending compliance for the two-year period from February 1, 1994, to January 31, 1996. He also noted that staff has obtained background checks and noted no irregularities. Mr. Post noted that S1. Mary's has a strong record of trade area spending and are a credit to the community. He noted that representatives from S1. Mary's were in the audience should the COlillcil have any questions. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-18, Approving S1. Mary's Bingo Hall Premises Permit Renewal Application. The motion carried unanimously (3-0). F. Adopt. Resolution #96-19. Approving St. Marv's Charitable Gambling Premises Permit Renewal Application at Holiday Inn MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-19, Approving S1. Mary's Charitable Gambling Premises Permit Renewal Application at Holiday Inn. The motion carried unanimously (3-0). G. Pay Estimate #4 - County Road F Mr. Stonehouse stated that Pay Estimate #4 for County Road F improvements is $79,837.84, and the retainage in the amount of$5,409.91 is also being returned to the contractor. Mr. Stonehouse recommended payment to Midwest Asphalt, Inc. for Pay Estimate #4 is $85,247.75. He noted that this amount brings the total retainage amount to five percent of the construction to date. Mr. Stonehouse noted that retainage has been reduced as all insurance claims have been addressed by the contractor, with the exception of the Ricke basement issue and the City Public Works claims. He noted the contractor has indicated that his insurance company has denied the Ricke claim, however, the City has not received written documentation of this decision. Mr. Stonehouse continued that the contractor has informed him he will deliver a check for all Public Works claims at the time he receives payment for Pay Estimate #4. Mr. Stonehouse stated that the remaining retainage and the contractor's performance bond are sufficient to maintain control over the contractor in order to correct or address any outstanding issues in the spring. Mr. Craig Wilson, 1677 West County Road F, stated he has issues with the repairs made by the contractor, including his concrete driveway cracking and sinking, as well as unacceptable workmanship. Mr. Wilson stated that sod was laid late in October, 1995, and was covered with sand from the construction. He stated the sod did not root properly, and suspected it would need replacement in the spring.