My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2012 Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Financial Planning and Analysis Committee (FPAC)
>
FPAC Packets
>
2012
>
09-11-2012 Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2025 3:10:13 PM
Creation date
9/8/2025 3:10:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> DEN HILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: September 11,2012 <br /> TO: Financial Planning and Analysis Committee <br /> FROM: Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services <br /> SUBJECT: Discussion on Utility Rate Study <br /> At our June meeting, it was decided that we would need to be flexible in our scheduling as we were going <br /> to work on the Utility Rate Study for our Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Surface Water Management Funds. <br /> • Staff has been able to gather enough data with the help of our new intern Ian Jackson to be able to keep <br /> our September meeting date. <br /> Staff has compiled figures for usage of all our customers, 20-year estimates on infrastructure costs for the <br /> systems, and the preliminary operating budgets. This will give us enough information to run scenarios for <br /> the group,as we also have an updated financial forecasting model that will demonstrate these for us. <br /> Staff will demonstrate how the model works and will then ask for direction from the committee on what <br /> types of scenarios you would like to see run. Once we have received direction from the committee, staff <br /> will program in the scenarios and we will have another meeting to show you how these different scenarios <br /> affect revenues,fund balance, and where we would need to adjust the rates based on each case. <br /> We have included some information on new legislation which allows cities to still meet the conservation <br /> criteria that was set a few years back, (which our current system was built on) but allows alternatives to <br /> what was allowed before. The committee might want to discuss this as we look at what types of scenarios <br /> you want to see. <br /> Once staff has received this feedback, we will evaluate what we expect our timeline to be and we can talk <br /> about scheduling our next meeting. Our goal is to present a recommendation from the committee to the <br /> City Council at its November worksession. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.