Laserfiche WebLink
Focus on New Laws: Water Conservation Rate Requirements Page 1 of 2 <br /> • LEAGUE of <br /> MINNESOTA <br /> CITIES <br /> Focus on New Laws: Water <br /> Conservation Rate <br /> Requirements <br /> Cities now have options for meeting state water conservation mandates. <br /> (Published Sep 6, 2012) <br /> Many cities provide an essential ingredient: clean water. They now have more ways to demonstrate <br /> careful use of it. <br /> 2 e <br /> Chapter 150(Link to:https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/.td_I50&doctype_Chapter&year=201 &typ =0) SF 1567) made <br /> amendments to Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291, subdivisions 3 and 4(Link to: <br /> https://www.revisor.,nn.govistatutes/?id=103G.291)to allow cities to set uniform rates, where each gallon costs the same, <br /> but show how they conserve water by decreasing demand for it. Conserving water is the goal. <br /> Previous law required that by January 2013, large public water suppliers use a"conservation rate <br /> structure"as the only way to achieve conservation. Under the conservation rate structure,the more water <br /> you use compared to others in your class of customer,the more you pay for each gallon. <br /> To make this a little more fun,think of buying a Twins baseball ticket. Even during a less than stellar <br /> season,you pay quite a bit extra for the best seats in the house because they're in a certain block of <br /> 41) seats. Under conservation rate structures, a city may charge those who use large amounts of water more <br /> for each gallon because they are in that tier of extensive water usage. <br /> However, for some users of city water,that rate structure change sent their water charges soaring. As a <br /> result, instead of saving water, as the law intended, some users were considering drilling their own wells <br /> and using even more water.Legislative efforts were made to both repeal city authority to prevent private <br /> well drilling and to get rid of conservation rate structure completely. <br /> Instead of eliminating a law that that many communities wanted to preserve and that has a laudable <br /> goal—to conserve water—the League worked to build flexibility into the requirement. The amended law <br /> removes the mandate that public water suppliers serving 1,000 or more people use conservation rate <br /> structures by January 2013. Instead, it allows city water systems to show how they are reducing demand <br /> for water even if the city still uses a uniform rate structure. The deadline to have these water demand <br /> reduction efforts in place is now moved back to Jan. 1,2015. <br /> Each water system may now develop ways to reduce demand, known as demand reduction measures, <br /> showing just that—reduced water usage. Water systems may do all this as part of each system's water <br /> supply plan review process. Cities may still use the previous conservation rate structure,too, if that is <br /> preferred in their situation. <br /> Demand reduction measures means measures that reduce water demand, water losses,peak water <br /> demands, and nonessential water uses. A"conservation rate structure"means a rate structure that <br /> encourages conservation and may include increasing block rates, seasonal rates,time of use rates, <br /> • individualized goal rates, or excess use rates. <br /> http://www.lmc.org/page/l/fonl-waterconservation.j sp?utm_source=Sept.+6%2C+2012&ut... 9/6/2012 <br />