My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-2013 Agenda additional
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Financial Planning and Analysis Committee (FPAC)
>
FPAC Packets
>
2013
>
12-10-2013 Agenda additional
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2025 4:08:54 PM
Creation date
9/8/2025 4:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Fiscal Capacity is calculated as follows: <br /> Fiscal Capacity=Population, Multiplied times Metro IMV per Capita <br /> (Divided by) <br /> The MCD IMV per Capita <br /> For Arden Hills,the 2012 Fiscal Capacity was: <br /> 9552 * $94,800 = 8673.41 Arden Hills' Fiscal Capacity <br /> $104,403 <br /> The Fiscal Capacities of all MCD's totaled 3,117,288. Arden Hills' percentage share of the <br /> total Fiscal Capacity was .27824%. This percentage was multiplied times the total regional <br /> pool Tax Capacity contributions of $389,815,867. Arden Hills' share of the regional Tax <br /> Capacity in 2012 was $1,084,613. Multiplying this times the local 2011 tax rate of 24.187% <br /> resulted in the amount of $262,335 in tax revenue received by Arden Hills for 2012 from <br /> Fiscal Disparities. This averages out to about$27.46 per capita. <br /> C. Fiscal Disparities Distribution and Land Use <br /> The degree to which different land uses in Arden Hills bring in Fiscal Disparities revenue can <br /> also be calculated in a similar manner. Arden Hills has Bethel University,which has <br /> population, yet does not have taxable market value. Without Bethel,Arden Hills would <br /> • receive less revenue, because its population would be lower. Likewise,the mobile home park, <br /> in which the mobile homes are taxed as personal property, also has a considerable amount of <br /> population,yet a relatively small taxable market value. Arden Hills' single-family homes tend <br /> to be higher than the regional average market value per capita, and therefore do not bring in as <br /> much revenue as the other residential uses. <br /> The amount each residential land use can be calculated in the same manner as calculating the <br /> regional distribution. Table 11 shows this. First, each land use must receive a per capita share <br /> of the commercial/industrial market value used in the computations;then equalization factors <br /> must be factored in. The result is the Indicated Market Value (IMV) for each residential land <br /> use. Next,the population to derive Fiscal Capacity divides the IMV.Note that Bethel <br /> University, other exempt residential and the mobile home park have very low Fiscal <br /> Capacities. The other uses have higher Fiscal Capacities than the regional average ($94,800) <br /> as well as the city's average of$104,403. As a result,their proportions compared to the city <br /> average are less than 1. This proportion is multiplied times the population to get the <br /> distribution index,just as in the regional calculations. Next the distribution indices are divided <br /> by the city total to get the percentage that each land use is responsible for the city's Fiscal <br /> Disparities distribution. Note that Bethel and the other exempt uses bring in about$67 per <br /> capita, and the mobile home park brings in about $48. The apartments and condominiums <br /> bring in amounts closer to the city average while the town homes, 2-3 unit residence units and <br /> single-family homes bring in far less than the city average. Map 10 shows the Fiscal <br /> Disparities revenue distribution. Blue dots represent parcels that bring in less than the city <br /> average because of their higher value. Yellow dots show parcels that bring in almost the <br /> • average, while green dots show parcels and land uses that bring in substantially more revenue <br /> because of their lower taxable market value per capita. Think of these land uses as individual <br /> cities, with each bringing in revenue in inverse proportion to their relative wealth. <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.