My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
09-08-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2025 5:02:49 PM
Creation date
9/8/2025 4:59:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — AUGUST 11, 2025 3 <br />approximately $500,000. He requested staff provide the City Council with further information on <br />the TCAAP development professional charge that was written into the fee schedule. <br />City Administrator Jagoe stated she would provide the Council with further information on this <br />fee. <br />Mayor Grant inquired if the County or the City would be paying for the trail. He explained he <br />would like the City to be reimbursed if the City paid this expense. He stated the trunk utilities and <br />sub -trunk utilities were to be constructed when a development site is approved by the JDA and <br />the developer was to participate in the extension of the public improvements. He read further <br />language within the JPA and asked if the County was acting as the developer at this time. <br />Councilmember Monson stated the JDA spoke about this topic at their last meeting and staff <br />would be investigating this further. <br />Mayor Grant reported that the JPA states that if the County wants to put a road in prior to <br />development occurring, the Council would have to agree to this. <br />Councilmember Weber stated it was his understanding an agreement had to be reached between <br />the perspective developer and the JDA. <br />Councilmember Monson commented she would like further information from the JDA attorney <br />on this matter. <br />Mayor Grant believed it would benefit both the City and the County to go by the language <br />within the JPA and as this moves forward that this language be clearly defined for both parties. <br />He recommended a new planning effort be considered for the TCAAP site and suggested this <br />topic be brought to the JDA. He reported if the City were to pursue this, he wanted to be assured <br />the City would be reimbursed for this work. <br />Councilmember Weber reported the City being reimbursed was a very high priority to him. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the City Council spent almost a year making sure the JPA was as <br />clear as possible and the Mayor was bringing up this concern to ensure the City was properly <br />protected and that the City's costs were being reimbursed. She questioned if the developer had a <br />timeline for the other 32 acres within the thumb parcels. <br />City Administrator Jagoe indicated she would have to verify the purchase and sale agreement <br />timeline. <br />Mayor Grant reported he was of the opinion now was the time for the Council to be asking <br />questions regarding TCAAP, even if these questions were difficult to answer. He requested a <br />copy of the JPA be placed in the next JDA packet. <br />Councilmember Monson clarified for the record that she has read the JPA but indicated she did <br />not have it in front of her at this time so she could not review it at this moment. She suggested the <br />JPA be provided to the City Council in a packet for future reference. <br />Councilmember Rousseau explained she would like to receive a copy of the JPA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.