Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 8. 1996 <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired what the distance was of the sideyard on the north end of Lot 20. <br />ML Ringwald stated is was approximately 10 feet <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Aplikowski inquired how one lot could be created under one abstract. ML <br />Ringwald replied that an RLS could accomplish that Mr. Nelson stated a RLS would be <br />approximately $4,000, and would not be willing to pay the additional costs, as the project is <br />already more than he anticipated. <br /> <br />Mr. Ringwald suggested, if the Council is uncomfortable with proceeding, then postpone the <br />planning case while staff researches to verify if the property has been consolidated. Acting <br />Mayor Aplikowski stated the Council does not wish to postpone the project, but only wished to <br />clarify the lot di visions. <br /> <br />ML Nelson noted the Lot 19 is not a fulliot, and cannot be built on anyway. He stated he needs <br />to move forward on the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired what the total square footage of the lot was. ML Ringwald stated <br />it is 15,485, and includes the Lot 19 portion. Council member Hicks stated he assumes it is one <br />lot, as R-2 zoning does not allow lot sizes less than 11,000 square feet Council discussed lot <br />sizes at length, and determined that Lot 19 was unbuildable and should not be subdivided in the <br />future, based upon its smaller size. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt Planning Case #96-02, <br />Stephen Nelson - Front Yard Setback Variance and Utility and Drainage <br />Easement Vacation, subject to the conditions as set forth by the Planning <br />Commission recommendations. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />ML Nelson clarified that there will bc approximately four hours of lost service during the <br />sanitary sewer line construction. <br /> <br />C. Resolution No. 96-24. Acceptin!! Bid and Authorizing Execution of Contract in the <br />Matter of the Lift Station #6 Modifications <br /> <br />Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent, reviewed for the Council that Lift Station #6 has <br />been identified for modifications due to its age, type of construction, and safety reasons. He <br />stated proposals were received from three companies; Tri-State Pump and Equipment Company, <br />Waldor Pump Company, and Quality Flow Systems. ML Stafford stated after reviewing the <br />proposals with Mr. Janski, MSA Engineer, StafIrecommends accepting the bid of$23,544.50 <br />from Quality Flow Systems. ML Stafford stated Tri-State's bid did not include a new concrete <br />top with aluminum hatch, and Waldor Pump's bid did not include site restoration. ML Stafford <br />stated $26,600 has been included in the 1996 budget for this modification. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />I <br />. <br />-. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />~. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />-. <br />. <br />