My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 05-28-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CC 05-28-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:22 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:48:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />. <br />.. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />.e <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 28. 1996 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Mr. Roach inquired how the front footage was calculated. Mr. Stonehouse stated it varied in <br />different areas, but that his particular lot was calculated by the deep lot method. <br /> <br />Mr. Roach inquired about the construction period. Mr. Stonehouse stated construction would <br />begin by late June and be completed by September. <br /> <br />Mr. Gene Schmidt, 1628 Chatham Avenue, inquired if McCracken Lane was overlayed five <br />years ago as Chatham Avenue was, would residents be assessed today at the amount they are. <br />Councilmember Malone stated the City was out of funds at the time and could not overlay <br />McCracken Lane. He stated he could not say if the assessment cost would be less or not if an <br />overlay had occurred. Mr. Schmidt stated it would be a large penalty for the residents to pay <br />if overlaying was a mistake five years ago. <br /> <br />Mr. Ochiaga, 1539 Oak Avenue, inquired if parking alternatives could be arranged for Oak <br />Avenue. Mr. Stonehouse stated there is more construction planned for Oak Avenue, include <br />sub-cutting of sections beneath the pavement. He stated there would be periods during the <br />day where no access will be possible, but there will be emergency access 24-hours per day, and <br />access at the beginning and end of each day in all types of weather. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that Mr. and Mrs. LeRoy Albjerg of 1680 Oak Avenue had previously <br />submitted a letter of objection to the Council. Mr. Fritsinger stated there were no other <br />formal assessment objections. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst inquired of the process of addressing the several objections identified. Jerry <br />Filla, City Attorney, stated that state statute requires that each objection be responded to. Mr. <br />Filla reiterated each individual objection. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst inquired if each objection must be resolved before closing the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted a letter was submitted from Steve Flanagan of 1469 Arden Oaks Drive <br />objecting to the assessment. He stated that the west two-thirds of the Flanagan property is <br />located within the Rice Creek Watershed easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Schmidt noted that his is a corner property on both Chatham Avenue and McCracken <br />Lane. <br /> <br />Mr. Herbst asked for clarification of the 30-day appeal process. Mr. Filla stated that in order <br />to reserve one's right to appeal the assessment, an objection must be filed this evening. Mayor <br />Probst clarified that the 3D-day appeal is through the court system. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks noted that the Schmidt property driveway is on Chatham Avenue, <br />similar to the Barnier property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.