Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MAY 28. 1996 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Councilmember Keirn suggested discussing each objection and coming to a conclusion this <br />evening. Mayor Probst stated he was concerned about discussing each one among the <br />Council, and suggested staff work with each individual and come back to the next Council <br />meeting. He stated he did not agree with Councilmember Hicks to eliminate the Johnson <br />(1535 Lake Johanna Boulevard) and Behr (1401 West County Road E) properties from the <br />assessment rolL <br /> <br />MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve Resolution #96-36, <br />Adopting Final Assessment Roll-8 Years, with the following properties tabled <br />until the June 10, 1996, Regular City Council Meeting: <br /> <br />Roach, 1628 Oak Avenue <br />Johanson, 1535 Lake Johanna Boulevard <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve Resolution #96-34, <br />Adopting Final Assessment Roll-5 Years, with the following properties tabled <br />until the June 10, 1996, Regular City Council Meeting: <br /> <br />Schmidt, 1628 Chatham Avenue <br />Herbst, 3799 McCracken Lane <br />Barnier, 1624 Chatham Avenue <br />Behr, 1401 County Road E <br />Christianson, 1438 Arden Oaks Drive <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated that staff will be contacting the individual property owners identified to <br />address the issues raised before the June 10th Council meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated the three objections that were denied can appeal through the court <br /> <br />system. <br /> <br />Greg Smith, 1644 Oak Avenue, inquired what the difference was between the contract price <br />and total estimated project costs. Mr. Stonehouse replied that the additional costs were from <br />engineering and administrative overages, and were reflected in the assessment rolL <br />