CC 07-08-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 7 II, The East-West private street between Parcels A-I and B should not be dedicated as a public street (collector); and 12. Parcel B shall be analyzed by itself in relationship to the land development parameters and that those parameters shall not be flexed from what the City Code allows. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary minor subdivision, subject to the following conditions: I. Provision of the necessary drainage and utility easements, prior to Planning Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; 2. Provision of the necessary vehicular cross access easements, prior to Planning Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; and 3. Dedication and/or payment of the appropriate park dedication for Parcels A-2 and B, as determined by City Council. Mr. Ringwald noted that the City Code requires a 4/5 vote of the Council to approve a PUD master plan. Mayor Probst asked ifthe applicant accepts the proposed conditions. Walt Seiler, representing CDS, stated they agree with all conditions except one, the 25 to 50 foot setback requirement into the wooded area (Area #1). Mayor Probst questioned the zero lot line building setback between Parcels A-I and C and stated his concern that if these parcels were significantly redeveloped, the City would not want to guarantee the zero lot line option, Mr. Ringwald advised the lot line being questioned exists as shown. He eXplained that if the building on Parcels A-I and C were destroyed and rebuilt, it would probably be assumed that the current lot line conditions would again be acceptable, if the buildings were rebuilt as they currently exist. Mayor Probst stated if this were to happen, he would support requiring tlle new development to provide building setback adjacent to the common lot line, Mr. Ringwald advised this aspect was not discussed with the applicant but if the building were to be redeveloped, then he believes the owner would request a modification to the PUD. Mayor Probst requested assurances that the action being considered tonight would not prevent that from happening should the entire site be redeveloped. Mr. Ringwald suggested that if the council wishes assurances, then Condition 13 should be added to indicate this intention.