CC 11-25-1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 25. 1996 2 -' November 12, 1996, Regular Council Meeting I Correct Page 6, fourth paragraph, to indicate: "Councilmember Malone asked staff to determine the amount of interest that has accrued on street improvement assessments in the PIR fund, to assist Council in making a determination on the I scone of 1997 Street Improvement projects." Correct Page 7, third paragraph, to indicate: "Mr. Fritsinger noted the League policies are similar to those of AMM but the League represents cities as a whole state-wide. I MOTION: Malone moved and Keirn seconded a motion to approve the November 12, 1996, Regular Council Meeting minutes as corrected. The motion carried unanimously I (5-0). PUBLIC COMMENTS I Mayor Probst invited the audience to address the Council on any issue not already on the agenda. I There were no public comments. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS .. A. Planning Case #96-17, Arby's/Sbarro PUD I Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, reviewed the location of the property under consideration and surrounding uses. He explained the applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Plan (St. Paul Properties) and Final Plan I (Arby's/Sbarro) to facilitate the construction of a 4,137 square foot fast food restaurant on an approximately five acre parcel zoned B-3. The applicant is proposing two principal uses for the property, a fast food use and a retail use. I Mr. Ringwald advised the Planning Commission separated this application into two areas of I discussion, use of the property and traffic related issues. He commented on the proposed use of the property, Lexington A venue Business Plan, and memorandum from various traffic consultants. Mr. Ringwald noted that fast food restaurants in Arden Hills must be at least 1,320 I feet apart, however, Section V, H, 4 of the Zoning Ordinance allows a waiver within a B-3 zone if the use can meet five criteria which have been set forth. He reviewed the five criteria as follows and explained each: I 1. The operation consists of one or more drive-in businesses or fast food restaurants and is an integral part of a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation I is part of an architecturally unified "food court" or "drive-in service court" complex containing two or more restaurants, fast food restaurants or drive-in businesses; 2. Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such restaurants, fast food .. restaurants or drive-in businesses in said building or complex; I ----