My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-25-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CC 11-25-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:24 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 2:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 25. 1996 4 <br /> It Councilmember Malone stated in reviewing the five criteria, he believes the proposal is not the <br /> type of development that is desirable since it does not currently meet the "test" for the use of this <br /> I property. <br /> Councilmember Keirn asked how the 1,320 feet guideline was determined and whether it was <br /> I determined when Burger King applied. Mr. Ringwald advised that the review of the Burger <br /> King site plan addressed this requirement. <br /> I Councilmember Aplikowski stated she favors the Arby's/Sbarro proposal but understands it <br /> needs some "tweaking." She stated this plan was devised some time ago and while she <br /> appreciates the concerns expressed by current users, she believes those concerns can be <br /> I addressed. She asked if this same discussion would occur if the restaurant was just an Arby's. <br /> Mr. Ringwald stated a single use fast food would not be allowed. <br /> I Mayor Probst explained the applicant proposes that having a joint use constitutes a "food court" <br /> type of use. <br /> I Councilmember Hicks reviewed the Mayor's suggestion that the applicant "step back" from the <br /> application request to address traffic issues and a larger development plan. He noted if this <br /> Ie structure were attached to the building on the north, the 1,320 foot limitation could be waived. <br /> He asked if it is really a traffic/circulation concern rather than a land use concern. <br /> I Mayor Probst stated it is and noted the traffic problem is a fundamental issue since the proposed <br /> access location is not a good one. He noted it may be possible to consolidate an access point <br /> with Shannon Square. <br /> I George Lang, St. Paul Properties, reviewed his history with this company and the location of <br /> nine buildings owned by St. Paul Properties within this general vicinity. He reviewed the various <br /> I requests for purchase of small parcels which have been turned away because they were not <br /> desirable uses. Mr. Lang reviewed the request of Franchise Associates to allow two separate <br /> I entities (restaurants) within a single building. He stated the request under consideration tonight <br /> is whether this use fits into the City's plan as a permitted use and whether the intended use is <br /> appropriate. Mr. Lang stated they will work with the City to draft an overall plan for the B-3 and <br /> I B-4 areas. <br /> Mr. Lang reviewed the aligrunent of a roadway proposed to be extended to connect to Shannon <br /> I Square which will alleviate traffic problems at the access point to Lexington A venue. He stated <br /> his belief that the current proposal is actually two separate businesses since it is two separate <br /> kitchens, cash registers, etc. He asserted this is a key distinction and provides an alternative <br /> I which meets the need of fast food within the community without the need for additional curb <br /> cuts. Mr. Lang welcomed the opportunity to work with the City to resolve their mutual concerns. <br /> .. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.