Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 4 <br />Finance Director Yang reported the City received $2 million in local grants for the Old Highway <br />10 project to assist with covering the costs for the trail work. <br />Councilmember Weber commented on how bonding costs the City money, but noted it also <br />costs the City money to defer projects. He explained in the last Council meeting there was a <br />consensus to go with Option D or E. He noted he supported Options D or J moving forward. <br />Mayor Grant supported the Council focusing on Options D and J. <br />Councilmember Holden asked how many years the City would be bonding for. <br />Finance Director Yang reported this would be a 20 year bond. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding Options J-1 and J-2. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she would rather levy for dollars up front than throw away <br />funding on interest payments. She asked how much the City would be paying in interest each year <br />for 20 years. <br />Finance Director Yang estimated this to be $1.3 million on a $2.8 million bond. There was <br />further discussion around the interest amount and whether it was $1.3 million or $1.5 million. <br />Finance Director Yang confirmed it is the $1.3 million. <br />Councilmember Weber commented if the proposed street projects were further delayed, costs to <br />the City would continue to rise. He did not want to risk the street projects rolling over to a full <br />reconstruction. He supported the City paying $1.3 million for 20 years starting in 2028 then end <br />up with an unhealthy PIR Fund. <br />Councilmember Monson explained Scenario J has a shift in the PMP projects. She expressed <br />concern with how the delay and bonding would impact expenses for the City. She stated she <br />would like to see what it would look like to not shift the 2028 project. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated the bonding was not a short term action but rather would <br />require putting enough money into the budget for the future. She was of the opinion $50,000 was <br />too low. <br />Mayor Grant commented if the City set aside $180,000 (three levy points) in addition to the <br />$250,000, the City would have $430,000 annually. He indicated the Council could consider a 3% <br />additional levy increase over the next few years and this funding could go directly into the PIR <br />Fund. He explained he would like to avoid the $1.5 million in interest each year for the next 20 <br />years. <br />Councilmember Rousseau stated she understood this levy number would be high, but this does <br />have some appeal as this would assist with saving money over time. She understood this increase <br />would hurt initially but this may be the best option for the City in the long run. She indicated she <br />was also interested in making sure the road projects weren't shifted. <br />Mayor Grant noted Karth Lake was proposed for 2026 and Benton Way was proposed for 2028. <br />