My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
09-09-2025 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 1:24:26 PM
Creation date
9/25/2025 1:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Weber recommended the Met Council be invited to a future worksession <br />meeting to discuss the future line. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuire supported this recommendation. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the changes that were made to the electric vehicle <br />terminology. <br /> <br />Mr. Carter explained developers would be required to maximize rooftops on residential <br />buildings. He reported federal regulations could change this story in the future and noted tax <br />credits would flow to the project developer. He stated backup energy would be provided by the <br />electrical grid. He indicated onsite battery storage may also be an option in the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuire asked if it would be too onerous to require properties to have a backup <br />energy source. Mr. Carter stated he was uncertain if this could be regulated by the JDA or City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson discussed how all of the power lines would be buried underground <br />which meant it would be less likely there would be power outages. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Jebens-Singh reported during the conversations with Ryan Companies, it did not <br />appear there was anything onerous within the proposed sustainability guidelines. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber explained this appears to be the case, noting there were only minor code <br />items that were brought up by Ryan Companies. <br /> <br />Mr. Carter commented the only feedback he received was regarding the methodology for <br />confirming the 50% better than code. He then discussed the changes that were made at a <br />federal level that could impact the development of Rice Creek Commons. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Jebens-Singh stated she appreciated the fact the door remained open for the <br />proposed sustainability efforts for this project. She recommended the JDA remain conscience of <br />the costs and funding mechanisms going forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson reported residential solar took the biggest hit from the federal <br />government. Mr. Carter reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Monson discussed the potential challenges going forward for batteries given <br />how 90% of battery anodes were made in China. She anticipated a developer would benefit <br />economically from pursuing residential solar versus a district geothermal system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated this would depend on what rebates are being offered from Xcel <br />Energy. He reported in order to meet the LEED certification the JDA may have to consider a <br />district system. Mr. Carter commented the best thing for the development would be to meet
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.