Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> • 1. Reimbursement of the City's Right-of-Way Management Costs. We negotiated <br /> language in Minneapolis that would include bad debt that is ultimately collected in the <br /> calculation of the right-of-way management reimbursement fee that would be paid to <br /> cities. This particular revision would maximize the reimbursement amount that is <br /> received by a particular jurisdiction, and would prevent Metricom from excluding <br /> revenues that should be included in fee calculations. We are also recommending that the <br /> annual fee paid to cities for the use of their poles be increased annually, rather than every <br /> five years, by any increase in the consumer price index. This would ensure that the <br /> annual fee paid to cities keeps pace with inflation, and does not decrease, as would <br /> happen under Metricom's proposal. Finally, we included language that would require <br /> Metricom to reimburse municipalities for the reasonable costs of an audit if the results of <br /> any audit show that Metricom underpaid the right-of-way management reimbursement fee <br /> by more than five percent. <br /> 2. Management of Public Rights-of-Way and Public Property. In several areas, <br /> Metricom's standard agreement does not make clear that Metricom's rights are subject to <br /> a municipality's power to maintain its public rights-of-way and public facilities. We have <br /> rectified this deficiency in the model agreement by expressly stating that Metricom's <br /> operations are subject to a city's right to maintain its public rights-of-way and municipal <br /> facilities. We also included a change which states that Metricom cannot interfere in any <br /> manner with the operation, installation, maintenance, construction and reconstruction of <br /> all public rights-of-way and public facilities. In addition, our revisions make clear that <br /> Metricom will not obtain any property interest in municipal facilities (e.g., poles) and <br /> public rights-of-way. Lastly, we added language to Metricom's agreement which would <br /> require Metricom to notify a municipality, in writing, whenever it removes or relocates its <br /> radios. <br /> 3. Scope of Authorization. Our revisions expressly provide that Metricom is only <br /> authorized to use municipal facilities for the sole purpose of operating its system and <br /> providing mobile digital data services. Metricom is not authorized to provide telephone <br /> or cable television service. The specific language we added ensures that Metricom cannot <br /> expand its service offerings without obtaining a separate authorization from a <br /> municipality. <br /> 4. Reimbursement of Municipal Project Review Expenses. Metricom's standard <br /> agreement specifies that Metricom will reimburse cities for reasonable attorney's fees and <br /> other expenses up to a maximum amount of$1,000. Since this is a small amount that <br /> likely would not cover our clients' actual expenses, we increased the amount of the <br /> reimbursement to $2,000. This amount is fairly arbitrary and was increased to reflect <br /> greater expenses in Minneapolis. Your jurisdiction or member cities should feel free to <br /> reduce the reimbursement back to $1,000 if they make that policy decision. <br /> 5. Most-Favored Municipality Clause. We revised Metricom's "most-favored <br /> -9- <br />