My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-03-25 PC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2025
>
09-03-25 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2025 2:45:11 PM
Creation date
10/2/2025 2:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />3. Climate control: modify language to be less prescriptive <br />4. Cleanliness and enforcement/license revocation: review language for consistency with <br />other communities and modify to be less prescriptive <br />5. Roaming of chickens: review language to allow for chickens to move about a fenced area <br />within a backyard <br />6. Garages: consider updated language to allow for a chicken coop to be interior to a detached <br />garage <br />7. The neighbor consent policy: provide language to modify policy to neighbor notification <br /> <br />At the August 11 Special Work Session, the City Council discussed the keeping of ducks. The City <br />Council directed staff to bring forth the topic of the keeping of ducks to the Planning Commission <br />for discussion to occur along with the review of ordinance language for chickens. The Planning <br />Commission was asked to provide a recommendation to the City Council on whether the inclusion <br />of ducks should be considered in city ordinances. <br /> <br />Staff has revised the draft ordinance language to incorporate the City Council’s directed revisions <br />and the Planning Commission’s recommended revisions related to chickens. Based on the <br />Council’s direction for the Planning Commission to discuss whether ducks should be incorporated <br />in the ordinance language, staff has provided background information gathered from adjacent <br />communities and draft ordinance language to aid in the Planning Commission’s review of this <br />topic. <br /> <br />Overview of Ordinance Amendments <br /> <br />Staff has prepared a draft ordinance identifying language to be modified for the Planning <br />Commission’s review (Attachment A). The applicable Sections to be modified are as follows: <br /> <br />• Section 1325.07 Subd. 6.A, Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals <br />• Section 410.01, Subd. 3, Chickens License <br /> <br />Section 1325.07 Subd. 6.A, Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals <br /> <br />1) Modify language for the Keeping of Chickens <br /> <br />a. Modify coop size and location requirements for the keeping of chickens <br /> <br />The Planning Commission previously reviewed several updates to the structure requirements for <br />coops, pens, and exercise yards. Drafted amendments included increasing the minimum required <br />coop size from 12 square feet to 20 square feet, making an exercise yard optional, and keeping a <br />covered and fenced pen as a requirement. For location, the August draft included specific language <br />that the outer limit of the coop and pen shall in no instance be located less than 10 feet from the <br />property line, but the standard that the outer limit shall be closer to the principal dwelling upon the <br />license holder property than any other abutting property remained unchanged. <br /> <br />At the August meeting, the Planning Commission made recommendations about the minimum and <br />maximum coop size and the criteria for distance from principal dwellings on abutting properties.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.