Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – September 3, 2025 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Collins thanked Mr. Nguyen for his presentation. He then opened the meeting for public <br />comment. <br /> <br />Paula Ludewig, 1626 Lake Johanna Boulevard, explained she lived to the west of the subject <br />property. She noted one tree did go down, but noted there were several other trees on the lot. She <br />feared these trees would be removed and this was a concern to her. She stated she was also <br />concerned with how the drainage from this property would impact her home. She requested the <br />footprint of the proposed home be reconsidered to more closely match the existing home. She <br />discussed how her home shifts on her sandy lot and questioned if the proposed lot could support <br />a three story home. <br /> <br />Dianne Pidde, 1619 Lake Johanna Boulevard, reported she sent an email outlining her concerns <br />and the variances that were under consideration. She indicated she has lived in her home since <br />the mid-1970’s and was deeply connected to her neighbors and Lake Johanna. She appreciated <br />the need to join the two lots, but she was concerned with how the large structure would impact <br />the environment. She was of the opinion a non-conforming lot should move closer to conformity <br />when being redeveloped and not further away from conformity. She explained she wanted to <br />ensure that the lake was being protected and recommended a home with the same or similar <br />footprint as the existing home be considered for this lot. She was of the opinion the proposed <br />home was out of character for the neighborhood, especially given the size of the lot. She further <br />discussed how her view of the lake and sky would be lost if the new home were constructed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund asked if Ms. Pidde could support a two story home being built on this <br />lot. <br /> <br />Ms. Pidde stated she believed this would be reasonable. <br /> <br />Chair Collins closed the meeting for public comment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Burlingame reported this was likely the most constrained and visible lot on <br />Lake Johanna. He indicated the applicant has land based hardship, but the relief being requested <br />goes well beyond the minimums used. He expressed concern with the fact the home would be <br />built below flood plain standards. He recommended action on this item be tabled until the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District has reviewed this request or only approve the request if the number of <br />variances was reduced and the elevation of the home was increased. He did not support <br />approving the request without having safeguards in place because this would impact the entire <br />Lake Johanna corridor. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lindau stated improving that property as shown was welcomed in the City. He <br />explained he appreciated the thoughtfulness of the proposed plans. He understood this was <br />already a non-conforming lot but he had concerns about increasing the amount of impervious <br />surface to 66% and the FAR to .51 with no clear hardship. In addition, he had concerns with the <br />fact no improvements were proposed for the shore impact zone. He discussed how important it <br />was to impact the water quality for Lake Johanna. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jacobson indicated this was a non-conforming lot and it would be difficult to <br />meet the City’s setbacks. She discussed the history of the lot, noting this property began with a <br />cottage. She understood that some of the requirements for this property could not be met, but was