My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-25-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
10-13-25-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2025 8:31:51 AM
Creation date
10/9/2025 4:07:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 14 <br />Discussion ensued regarding how much a median value household would pay and how much <br />impact the different scenarios have on the PIR Fund. <br />Finance Director Yang pointed to the information in the packet. She said it is taking a look at the <br />15.0 plus any incremental. She said it is the third column is what we are looking to increase it by. <br />Councilmember Monson said scenario D2 is 17%. She asked if that's the total. <br />Finance Director Yang said that includes the 15% in the general fund, which is not a balanced <br />levy. We still have to consider that $122,000 from the 2025 deficit. The 17% includes the <br />$100,000. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if it was 17% and if we want to balance the previous fund, it's <br />another 2%. <br />Mayor Grant asked if Councilmember Monson was looking at the 20% under D 10. <br />Councilmember Monson isn't recommending 20%, she's just saying that was the top she saw <br />for trying to set the preliminary. She sees now it's 22%. <br />City Administrator Jagoe said we received an update from the Ramsey County Sheriff's <br />department on their proposed 2026 budget. She will forward the information as we learn more <br />from the Sheriff but it appears their amount for 2026 has gone up. It is a preliminary levy increase <br />of 1.7%, or $105,000. <br />Councilmember Weber asked if that was for our portion. <br />City Administrator Jagoe confirmed. The $105,000 is our cost share. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the other Contract Cities have already set their preliminary levies. <br />We are actually at an advantage by not having set ours, when we learned of this increase. It's not <br />good news but we can still consider it before setting our Preliminary Levy. <br />Mayor Grant asked where the $165,000 franchise for the fire department is, in the budget. <br />Finance Director Yang said that is sitting in the Fund Balance. <br />Mayor Grant said we're getting that on an annual basis but he didn't see it accounted for, <br />anywhere. <br />Finance Director Yang said it is accounted for in the Public Safety Capital Fund. It is sitting <br />there to cover a portion of the debt service. Our revenue is $435,000. We're paying down debt <br />service. The additional $165,000 sits in the Capital Fund. <br />Mayor Grant said it is sitting in the Capital Fund, but he doesn't see it acknowledging the <br />$165,000 overage. <br />Finance Director Yang said it may not be in this presentation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.