CC 02-24-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes oz Regu~ar Counci~ M~eting, February 24, 1986 Page 6 noted that the majority oz Council ze~t that the zunding oz the project vas inappropriate~y directed to municipa~ities zor vork on county and state roads. Counci~ considered Reso~ution MODIFICATION OF COUNTY OF MUNICIPALITIES AND AUTHORIZING 694/LEXINGTON BRIDGE/PATHWAY No. 86-13, RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COST SHARING POLICY BY PAYMENT OF ARDEN HILLS' SHARE OF Counci~ reca~~ed the projected cost oz the project at $1.2 mi~~ion more or ~essl noted that it seems inappropriate and vastezu~ to tear up Lexington again - project shou~d have been incorporated in the Lexington Avenue Improvement vhich vas recent~y comp~eted. Necessity zor the bridge/pedestrien yay project at this time vas . queried. It vas noted that the project cost is proposed to be apportioned 90X Federa~, 8.1X State and the ba~ance municipa~ities (1.9X)1 apparent purpose oz the project is to provide greater bridge c~earance zor trazzic on 1-694. Azter discussion, Counci~ concurred to invite MnDOT District Engineer Kermit McRae to the March 10 Counci~ meeting to exp~ain the need zor the bridge expenditure. Leaaue oz Minnesota Cities Reauest re State Budaet Cuts Council vas rezerred to request zrom Leegue zor assistance in convincing the Legis~ature oz the severity oz the governor's recommended cuts to cities. McNiesh asked Council's input on the areas Arden Hi~ls vou~d help. Counci~ generally concurred to he~p vith. ca~~ing/vriting legis~ators vorking vith the press inzorming City emp~oyees oz the problem OTHER BUSINESS Ham~ine Avenue Improvement Sather expressed concern re the the Hamline Avenue matter at motion to reconsider a previous by a dissenting member. manner in vhich Council dealt vith the February 3 meetingl zeels the motion shou~d rightzully have been Woodburn said it is his understanding that any member can make a motion, iz it is a nev .ession, vhether or not the motion rescinds a zormer motion. Woodburn said any suspected procedura~ errors vhich can and possibly do occur should be brought up et the time the error is made, so it can be rectizied. Board oz Appeals Appointment Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, to ratizy appointment oz Don Evane-as a member oz the Board oz the balance oz 1986. Motion carried unanimous~y. (4-0) the Mayor's Appeals zor REPORT OF VILLAGE.CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MCNIESH Cable TV Camera Operator Volunteers Council vas rezerred to McNiesh's memo (2/21/86) inzorming Counci~ oz zour camera operator volunteers, noting al~ vould have to take the Group W camera course at $5.00 eech. Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council authorize the $20.00 zee to send the zour vo~unteers to camera c~ass. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) . City Clerks Conzerence Sether moved, seconded by Hicks, that Counci~ approve McNiesh's attendance at the Merch 19-21 C~erks Conzerence and authorize the $90.00 conzerence zee. Motion carried unanimous~y. (4-0) Apportionment Reso~utions. Reilina/Everest Investment II Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Counci~ adopt the zol~owing Apportionment Reso~utions.