My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-12-1985
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
CC 11-12-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:32 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:08:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> . <br /> . <br /> Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, November 12, 1985 <br /> Page seven <br /> Advance Refunding Bonds <br /> Steve Mattson, Juran and Moody, presented a proposal for Advance Refunding <br /> of 1985 Bonds, which would result.in an estimated gross savings of about <br /> $618,000.00; present value savings of about $375,000.00. <br /> The Transaction Summary was reviewed by Mattson for Council. Mattson noted <br /> that interest rates have been driven down and feels strongly that the City <br /> can, by advance refunding, experience a $618,000 savings; noted this advance <br /> refunding may not be permitted after the first of the year; in order to sell, <br /> have to set a sale for the first week in December. Mattson said the City <br /> can lower its interest from 8% to 7%; explained that expected income from <br /> assessments will cover the $367,515.00 cash neaded from the City to enter <br /> into the transaction. Mattson explained that we don't have to take $367,000; <br /> could take $200,000, which would cut down the savings. The proposed new <br /> . issue is $2,200,000. Principal outstanding on the existing issue is <br /> $2,515,000. <br /> After discussion, Sather moved, seconded by Peck, to adopt Resolution No. <br /> 85-61, PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE OF $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION ADVANCE <br /> REFUNDING BONDS OF 1985. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) The sale was <br /> scheduled for December 3, 1985; bid opening at 11:00 a.m. at Juran and Moody <br /> with award of bid at a Special Council meeting on December 3, 1985, at <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> Council deferred further discussion and action relative to the Bond Refunding <br /> Proposal to the November 25 Council meeting, at which time Mattson will <br /> present more data, Treasurer Lamb to meet with Mattson in the interim. It <br /> was noted that if the bond sale is not consummated, no fees will be charged <br /> to City. <br /> Approval of License/Permit Fees Effective 1/1/86 (Resolution No. 85-60) <br /> Council was referred to proposed License/Permit Fees (effective 1/1/86) and <br /> to McNiesh's memo reporting comments received from the business community <br /> relative to the proposed fees. <br /> In discussion, Hansen reported receipt of several comments that the proposed <br /> increase from $30 to $50 for retail sales is too great. <br /> It was queried why a license is required for a veterinarian and not for <br /> dentists, medical doctors, chiropractors, etc. Also questioned was a license <br /> fee for private gas pumps (were not licensed previously). <br /> Woodburn moved, seconded by Sather, to adopt Resolution No. 85-60, Adopting <br /> the Fee Schedule as Proposed by Council at its previous meeting, deleting <br /> the licensing of private gas pumps and veterinary clinics. <br /> After discussion, the motion fa~led. (0-4) <br /> Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council action be deferred to the <br /> November 25, 1985 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR ROBERT RADDATZ <br /> Boulevard Tree TrimminR <br /> Council was referred to Raddatz' memo of 11/8/85. <br /> . Raddatz reported that the Public Works Department is trimming boulevard <br /> trees that are obstructing and/or hindering plowing and sanding of streets; <br /> noted that very few residents heeded the City's request last year to trim <br /> their trees. Raddatz reported that the cost of trimming is not known to <br /> date -- they are still trimming; noted that boulevardplantings are the <br /> responsibility of the property owners; reported the Public Works Committee <br /> was split on whether the City's costs should be passed 011 to the property <br /> owners. <br /> It was the consensus of Council to not charge this year. It was agreed that <br /> if the cost is to be assessed in future years, homeowners must be notified. <br /> of the problem and given adequate time to correct it, advising that if the <br /> work is not done, it will be done by the City and the cost assessed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.