CC 09-09-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , .-. Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985 Page two In discussion, concern was expressed re the clarity of Section 6.B Compliance (p. 13) and Section 3.G. Substandard Uses. Council concurred to refer these sections to Attorney Lynden and Planner Miller for modification. REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 85-10, Special Use Permit Amendment - Hunter's Park Miller reported that a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission relative to proposed modification of the Hunter's Park Special Use Permit to allow changes to the cluster homes in Hunter's Park, if no variances to the R-3 District are requested. Miller noted that variance requests would be handled by the variance procedure; noted that all applications to the City would be subject to prior approval by the Hunter's Park architectural committee, 4It Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of an Amended Special Use Permit to allow additions and alterations to the individual cluster homes, subject to conditions in minutes of 9/4/85. Mr. Crassweller (Hunter's Park Homeowners' Association) said the Association has no problem with the proposed amendments. Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, to accept the Planning Commission's recom- mendation to approve amendment of the Special Use Permit for Hunter's Park to allow alterations to the single family cluster homes (Additions 1, 2 and 4) subject to the following conditions: 1. If additions or other alterations do not require setback or coverage variances, only a building permit, issued administratively, will be required. 2. If additions or other alterations do require additional variances of any kind, the standard variance procedure shall apply. 3. In both cases, the Homeowners' Association shall review and approve the proposed addition or other alteration before submission to the City. In addition, the Homeowners' Association architectural review committee shall assist individual homeowners in determining if variances are required for proposed alterations. 4. These conditions shall not apply to the Hunter's Park apartments. Any modification of those structures shall require an amended Special Use Permi t. 5. The standard-lot, Single-family homes in Hunter's Park, which were not constructed under specifically approved site and building plans, shall be exempted from Homeowners' Association review and approval. 6. A written recommendation of approval shall be submitted to City, dis- closing the vote of the Homeowners' Association architectural review committee. In discussion, it was asked if other Special Use Permits wi1l.require review also, in order to allow minor changes. Miller said that Chatham is under a Special Use Permit; said it ~as not the intent~on, at the time of adoption of that Special Use Permit, but, technically, it could be the interpretation that the homes could not be modified. Miller said, without looking at the Chatham Special Use Permit, this could be the case in Chatham as well; noted that a style of homes was approved in the Chatham area, with certain minimum setback requirements. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . Case No. 85-13. Identification Si~n - Valentine Hills School Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, to approve the Valentine Hills School identification sign as proposed. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 85-12, Lot Split and Lot Area Variance - Glenn and Nancy BeRRin, 4519 Lakeshore Place Miller explained that a lot split was previously approved contingent upon a registered survey indicating that there would be no variances for the existing home. Miller reported that the survey shows the house was not located as previously shown; split as proposed will create a lot about 1,400 square feet below the required 14,000 square feet minimum - a 10% variance. Miller reported that the Board of Appeals and Planning Commission have