Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, May 28, 1985 <br />Page two <br /> <br />Water Improvement No. 83-4, Approval of Change Order No.2. Acceptance <br />of Project and Approval of Final Payment <br />Council was referred to Change Order No.2, and Christoffersen's letter <br />of 5/23/85 re Project W-83-4, Watermain along STH 10, north of STH 96. <br /> <br />Hicks moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Change Order No. 2 <br />in the amount of $1,854.00. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council accept the project (W-83-4) <br />and approve Final Payment in amount of $13,260.21. Motion carried unani- <br />mously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Royal Hills North Park Dedication Proposal <br />Council was referred to memo from Councilmember Hansen (5/16/85) relative <br />to park dedication proposal for Royal Hills North. Hansen noted a correction <br />from 23~ to 25~ per square foot, resulting in a cash dedication of $13,750. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council accept the 10,000 square <br />feet of pedestrian way, and $13,750 cash payment as fulfillment of the <br />park dedication requirement for Royal Hills North, the cash payment to <br />be payable in 28 equal installments, at issuance of building permits; <br />total of $13,750 to be paid within two years (5/13/87). Motion carried <br />unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Status Report - Northpark Business Center Park Dedication <br />Hansen reported that a 10% of land market value park dedication is not <br />acceptable to Woodbridge Properties for the Northpark Business Center; <br />noted that the assessor's market value is $362,000 (actual cost is $823,000). <br />Hansen had suggested the City accept a 7% cash dedication plus the fountain <br />($28,815) as satisfaction of the park dedication requirement; noted that <br />surrounding cities require a 3% - 5% park dedication from commercial/indus- <br />trial properties; reported that Woodbridge proposes a 3-1/2% dedication, <br />plus the fountain. <br /> <br />In discussion, Sather noted that Arden Hills is near the end in its ability <br />to gather revenue from land development from park dedication; feels we'd <br />be selling the City short by reducing the requirements. Hicks noted that <br />Arden Hills has always required 10%; feels other cities' charge is irrele- <br />vant. Sather noted that other cities also use general revenue for park <br />land and development of parks. Hansen noted that the City has negotiated <br />some park dedications in the past at 5%; noted that this is an indepen- <br />dent and separate development from the Woodbridge Office Center on County <br />Road E and should be negotiated on its own without reference to the County <br />Road E park dedication requirement. <br /> <br />After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council direct <br />Hansen to pursue a $57,600 cash donation (7% of actual land cost), repre- <br />senting a 3% credit for ponding, payable in ten years, 10% per year, <br />beginning at building occupancy. Motion carried. (Hicks, Sather, Peck, <br />Woodburn voting in favor; Hansen in opposition). (4-0) <br /> <br />Public Safety Committee Recommendation re Signage Request <br />Council was referred to Public Safety Committee minutes of 5/20/85 relative <br />to request for installation of "Slow - Children" sign near intersection <br />of Skiles Lane and Glenarden Court. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Moehnke, 1404 Skiles Lane, described the location of a hill; stated <br />that drivers seem to automatically accelerate at seeing a hill; noted <br />that the road also curves and drivers are going too fast to stop if a child <br />should dart into the road. <br /> <br />In discussion, it was noted that signs sometimes give a false sense of <br />security, possibly putting children at more risk. It was further noted <br />that the "Slow - Children" signs are ineffective in reducing speed. <br /> <br />Moehnke said they want something that will be effective; noted that "speed <br />bumps" were suggested. It was suggested by Council that a more appropriate <br />