My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-08-1985
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
CC 04-08-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:34 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:08:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />Village of Arden Hills <br />Monday, April 8, 1985 - 7:30 p.m. <br />Village Hall <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting <br />to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Thomas Sather, <br />Gary Peck, Nancy Hansen, Dale Hicks <br />None <br />Planner Orlyn Miller, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Clerk Administrator <br />Charlotte McNiesh. Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Absent: <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that the minutes of the March 25th Council <br />meeting be approved as amended. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Business From the Floor <br />None <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER <br /> <br />Case No. 85-2 Planned Unit Develo ment Conce t Plan - Gerald McGuire <br />Council was referred to Planning memo (3/20 85), Proposed Types of Units and <br />Amenities, minutes of Planning Commission meeting (4/3/85) and to transparencies <br />of proposed concept plan. <br /> <br />Miller explained that the applicant is proposing a residential planned unit <br />development consisting of 7 single family lots (to remain R-l zone), 31 town- <br />house units and 37 apartment units (rezone from R-1 to R-3). Miller <br />explained that the natural drainageway which crosses the site provides a natural <br />separation between the higher densities and the single family lots; explained <br />that the lots are intended to be sold for custom construction, the townhouses <br />will be sold as townhouse condominiums, and the apartments will be rented <br />initially and eventually sold as condominium units. <br /> <br />Miller reported that the proposed plan is at the maximum R-3 density (4.5 units <br />per net acre); noted that the City Comprehensive Development Plan designates <br />about 1/3 of the subject site as medium density (4.5 units per net acre). <br />Miller noted that approval of the Concept Plan identifies land uses and land <br />use intensity; explained that for approval of the PUD, more detailed plans <br />will have to be submitted, reviewed and approved in accordance with General <br />Plan requirements. <br /> <br />Attorney William Keefer, representing the applicant, Gerald McGuire, described <br />the proposed amenities of the 37 apartment-style condominiums, 29 of which <br />will be two-bedroom units and 8 one-bedroom units; noted that the two-story <br />building plus penthouse will have an elevator and will have underground park- <br />ing for 58 cars (I! spaces per unit), exterior will be all brick veneer. <br />The townhouses will be one and two-story buildings of brick and <br />maintenance-free siding, will be two and three-bedrooms; will have one-car <br />and two-car garages. Keefer explained that they must obtain concept approval <br />before approaching a mortgage lender. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In discussion, Council asked the following questions: <br />Queried why area is considered difficult for fire and police personnel to <br />find (resident comment at Public Hearing). <br />Miller reported that the resident feels it is difficult to give directions <br />to the area; poor access to main roads. Miller reported that the Planning <br />Commission did get into a discussion relative to a street extension from <br />Highway 10 to Round Lake Road West; pros and cons were that it would pro- <br />vide better emergency access for the industrial area to the west, but it <br />would cause a mix of industrial and residential traffic. Miller explained <br />that the PUD plan is usually reviewed by the Fire Chief as part of the <br />General Plan review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.