CC 04-08-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, April 8, 1985 Page four 3. Storm water storage within the drainage easement must meet RCWD require- ments and must be approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 4. The right-of.way for the new street along the south property line shall conform to the water and sewer easement. 5. The PUD Concept Plan is approved in accordance with Section VIII,G(2) of the Zoning Ordinance. Each stage of development is subject to all applicable provisions of Section VIII ,G(3) "General Plan". 6. Requested rezoning shall occur simultaneously with General Plan approval. 7. The apartment building will have a predominantly brick exterior and the . townhomes will have wood or metal house siding with brick trim. Motion was seconded by Sather and carried (Hicks, Sather, Hansen, Peck voting in favor of the motion, Woodburn voting in opposition). (4-1) Case. No. 85-3, Minor Subdivision - Lot Split and Consolidation, John Picha Council was referred to Planning Memo (3/25/85), Planning Commission minutes (4/3/85) and to a transparency showing the two subject lots (1184 Highway 96 and 1163 Karth Lake Drive). Miller explained that the proposed 40' adjustment of the rear lot lines has no impact on future development of adjacent land, and both lots exceed all dimensional and area requirements; noted that if approved. a surveyor R.L.S. will be needed by the City, prior to recording the split and consolidation. Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the lot split and con- solidation as requested. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 84-24, Parkway System Feasibility Study Miller explained that the thrust of the study is to create a system to improve the aesthetics of some of the streets, at the time they are reconstructed; reported that the Task Force had discussions with Ramsey County Public Works; explained that evaluations were made to determine the most adaptable routes, all of which could benefit by this design recommendation, which provides for bike/pedestrian paths separated from vehicular traffic. Miller reported that the Task Force and Planning Commission recommend approval of an amendment to the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan (pages 63 - 65b and maps 12, 12A and 14A of the Parkway System Feasibility Study). Miller noted that the Planning Commission recommended the addition of County Road F (35W to Highway 10) as an additional potential parkway route, a major entrance to Arden Hills from the west. Miller explained that Lake Johanna Blvd. was used to graphically show the parkway systems concepts; it was not intended to indicate priority. Miller said the plan will require review by the Metro Council staff, a courtesy review which will take about 30 days. In discussion, it was noted that on map 14A, over-story trees are shown 4' from the curb which does not seem realistic. Miller said the County also expressed this concern; feels it can be worked out. It was suggested that the cost-per-foot of the separated 8' wide bikeways be added to the study. . Miller noted that the two Planning Commission opposition votes did not oppose the document but they did not want the document altered without it going back to the Task Force. Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council accept the Parkway System Feasibility Study as presented. Hicks moved to amend the motion to add the additional gateway and parkway route on County Road F (35W - Old Highway 10). Motion was seconded by Peck. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)