Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, February 25, 1985 <br />Page two <br /> <br />The first cash flow sheet (for $2,515,000), allowing longer pay-off time, <br />calls for tax levy beginning in 1993; the second cash flow sheet presented by <br />Mattson (for $2,165,000 bond) would not require any tax levy, the alternate <br />cash flow sheet for $2,515,000 bond (calling for earlier pay-off) does call <br />for tax levy. It is Mattson's opinion that these levies will probably not <br />be needed, but must be included because of Bond Counsel's ruling of 105X <br />coverage of debt service. <br /> <br />Bond Counsel had also advised McNiesh that projects internally financed before <br />1978 cannot be included in the bond issue, are just too old, will have to <br />continue to be financed internally. McNiesh also pointed out that the only <br />thing that can be legally financed in the projects dating from 1978 to 1983 <br />are the deferred special assessments receivable; cannot include payment of . <br />interest after construction is completed, can only include costs of construc- . <br />tion and interest paid during construction. <br /> <br />Mattson asked City policy on financing of public improvements; Woodburn <br />responded that improvements are assessed at 100X rate to benefitted property <br />owners. <br /> <br />Woodburn asked how much of the $2,515,000 was overhead; about $67,000, includ- <br />ing legal fees, bond printing, bond registration, fiscal fee, ratings fee, <br />and discount factor. <br /> <br />Mr. Mattson stated that interest rates have risen about .33% since he last <br />spoke with this Council; reiterated urgency in getting these bonds on the mar- <br />ket as quickly as possible. <br /> <br />Mattson suggested that the bond sale be held at the Council meeting of <br />March 25, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. He stated that within ten minutes of the opening, <br />he would be able to make his recommendations to Council as to acceptance or <br />rejection of any bids. Asked to recommend best possible time for opening of <br />bids, he stated that 3:00 pm. in the afternoon, with the Clerk Administrator <br />and/or the Treasurer in attendance, probably would be best time. Council <br />can then formally accept or reject bids at 7:30 p.m. at regular Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Hicks, seconded by Peck, that Council adopt RESOLUTION <br />85-13, PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS IN AMOUNT OF $2,515,000, <br />bids to be opened at 3:00 p.m. Monday, March 25, award to be considered at <br />7:30 p.m. March 25, and Option A to be the repayment plan. Motion carried <br />unanimously. (5 - 0) <br /> <br />Mattson will supply this information to Briggs and Morgan, Tuesday, <br />February 26, and they will draft the Resolution calling for bond sale. Vil- <br />lage should have this within four to five days. <br /> <br />Lamb asked when monies would be available to Arden Hills; Mattson replied <br />probably by the middle to third week in April. A draft of the Prospectus <br />should be ready within two weeks and will be brought to the City for review <br />before going to press. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Committee Recommendations <br />Parks Director Buckley presented to the Council his committee's recommendations <br />for the 1985 Park Improvement Program. and Ten Year Park Development Plan. . <br />He pointed out changes in recommendations from June, 1984...one major change is <br />in development of Arden Oaks Park. In Committee's original plans for develop- . <br />ment of this 1.3 acre park, grading and seeding were scheduled for 1985, with <br />further development in 1986. Favorable weather conditions had made it possi- <br />ble for this to be completed in 1984; Buckley had held a neighborhood meeting, <br />they are anxious for earlier construction, and concurred with Park's Committee <br />suggestions for development. Budget calls for play equipment installation and <br />preparation of a grass all-purpose field, and installation of a backstop. <br />Also added to 1985 estimate is color-coating of hard surface area at Sampson <br />Park and landscaping at Freeway (both delayed from 1984). Last addition is <br />planner's fee for planning immediate and long range landscaping plans in several <br />of the parks. <br />