CC 04-23-1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , JEAN WINIECKI: Another concern is the arsenal wanting City water. Is that going to be another thing that will affect our neighborhood because of our proximity to the arsenal. MAYOR ~IOODBURN: - No, it won't be. ~Iorry not. That one you won't pay for. In fact, you only can benefit if it would go through, in your costs, but that's a discussion a little later tonight. Anything else for the moment, Mr. Christoffersen? MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: As far as the question, How much? I'm not prepared to say how much because the decision hasn't been made. I think Mr. Deans went through the general rates that might be looked at, and I alluded to the portions that probably would not be re assessed. Actually, there are areas along Highway 10 at least the first 200' along Highway 10 that were previously assessed for sewer on a front footage basis that would probably not be considered ... again as an assessment. It would be the property more remote from the 200', the interior portion, that would be assessed. I don't really know what the footage would be. JEANNE WINIECKI: How would that be assessed front footage when its just acreage? MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: The land adjacent to the sewer would be considered the front footage - the 200' adjacent to the sewer line; this area would receive service; property will be closer to this main 1 ine. . GEORGE WINIECKI: I guess I'm talking to Mr. Christoffersen on those two diagrams. (inaudible) It appears that the property at 4175 will bear a bulk of the assessment. It's my feeling that possibly the Council is aware of some things, down there that this property may... sooner or later it's going to develop. I think something will happen on it in the not too near fut~re. Is the location of this sewer line where it should be? Obviously, you have to look at the proximity of things down there. Are the areas chosen the best choice. MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: There are two alternate locations that we looked at - along the watermain line, the northerly one along the north of your property. That was a difficult decision when we put the water line in. It was felt by the adjacent property owners that there might be a road in that general location, possibly extended through to 14th Street to make a connection. That is one location. The southerly one you notice on the draw- ing, is the one along the freeway following the most shallow land that we could to get around. Obviously, if the program were undertaken, it would be in the best efforts to find out from the property owners their best guess as to where to put the line. Obviously, we would not want to put it right through a building we would want to locate it where it's most practical. I think we're looking at, on the northerly side of your particular pro- perty that's the deepest, I believe, and as you come down it probably falls off to the south. It gets shallower and shallower. 6 ...