Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />the sewer was inadequate, none-the-1ess. they got rid of it off <br />their property; therefore benefit was difficult to show. Taxes <br />can be Village-wide; would be Village-wide. Mrs.Winiecki. <br /> <br />JEANNE WINIECKI: How do you justify an assessment through <br />swamp that is supposed to be set aside for park dedication? <br />under the tower? <br /> <br />the <br />and <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: The people owning the tower agreed to any <br />assessments, in writing. The Council saw to that; so. they'd be <br />paying part that otherwise would be going on taxes. Mr. Winiecki. <br /> <br />JIM WINIECKI: These people up north that won't be assessed. <br />How did we get an assessment for the water when we don't have it? <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: You were assessed for the main, not an <br />assessment for water service to your house; service to your house <br />could be another assessment. It's the same as happened in other <br />parts of the Village - a large main comes in - one area is not <br />ready for water, but the main has to be paid for, and you have to <br />have it - let's assume you do; so the whole area is served by a <br />main and is assessed for the main; and later on there may be an <br />assessment on your street if water came down there to serve you <br />directly. That is routine. <br /> <br />JEANNE WINIECKI: How does that differ from the sewer that we <br />are talking about? <br /> <br />. MAYOR WOODBURN: I'm doing an awful lot of talking. I'm <br />going to get Mr. Christoffersen to talk. <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: In this particular case. you were charged <br />an area charge; obviously the 12" main does not go in front of your <br />house; to get water to your house. a 6" to 8" main would have to be <br />extended to your property. By putting the 12" main in. it put water <br />that much closer to your property and the area charge is assessed <br />to get the water closer to you. that's the reasoning behind it. <br />The same thing is applied to the south end of Round lake in the <br />area we have described. There is a sewer going through, a large <br />sewer. The area immediately adjacent to it, beyond the 200'. but <br />within the service area is proposed to be assessed. Only those <br />areas that would most likely connect diret1y to it, not the area, <br />for instance. - say the rendering plant is already connected to an <br />existing sewer built by New Brighton; that area would not be <br />assessed, because it would receive no benefit. There is some <br />area to the west, or to the east, that is remote from the sewer, <br />and those properties along 1-694 are away from the sewer, but are <br />still closer to the sewer line, and the sewer is deep enough to <br />where little short prices can get it to them. While now, they <br />have to go a long way away. I guess that's the rationale behind <br />the area assessment. <br /> <br />9 <br />