Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />MRS. MCNIESH: No. I do not. That was before my time. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Well, at all times, there was another sewer <br />planned. There was never a time when some kind of main wasn't <br />considered, as going to be necessary. <br /> <br />JEANNE WINIECKI: It seems to me then the area that is going <br />to be assessed hasn't caused the need. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: That is often the case. <br /> <br />CHRISTOFFERSEN: Let me say this. At the time that all this <br />action was going on, I don't believe that New Brighton sewer was <br />an issue until - I want to say 1975, that we became aware that it <br />was available for use, and that New Brighton even wanted the City <br />to use it, and by that time the City was committed to a new line <br />to the south. The City was against using it at that time because <br />New Brighton didn't have enough capacity in that line, according <br />to them - they only had a small amount - they wanted us to use <br />that small amount, but not everything. Since Arden Hills was <br />faced with building that whole line to the south, we thought that <br />was the best way to proceed. It was only in 1980 or 1981 that <br />New Brighton was able to realize that the capacity of that sewer <br />they had barred Arden Hills, far exceeded what they had planned <br />on; so, consequently, they came to us and asked us if we could <br />use that additional capacity. Total - look back at the whole thing <br />and had New Brighton been right at the very beginning, that would <br />have been the best plan; so, I think what we're ending up with is <br />th~ best plan. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Just a short time more - if there are... <br />are there any comments from any body that hasn't spoken yet? <br /> <br />DON GROWER: I am a planner and I represent the Naegele <br />Companies and their site, and 1 guess we're only concerned that <br />there be some kind of a fair measure of benefit for assessment <br />against the property. Secondly, we would feel that this is kind <br />of an incentive for us to develop some site plans for the develop- <br />ment of the property and we would like the sewer to follow a <br />pattern that we would layout. That's our only comments. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: One more. <br /> <br />JIM WINIECKI: What is the possibility that this project <br />could be delayed and new owners consulted. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: That gets to be kind of indefinite. like <br />the property over here. <br /> <br />JIM WINIECKI: Then, like I said before, we get besieged by <br />assessments going through us, let's spread this out for more <br />people. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: anything... one more. <br /> <br />11 <br />