CC 03-12-1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of Regular Council Meeting Monday, March 12, 1964 Page Three . Mulcahy asked for clarification on Squire's Chatham House Style Audit; asked why homes on Brighton Way were not Included; noted these homes were not built by Ban Con and are not Ban Con style houses. Mulcahy said he feels the survey Is defective In this respect; Is dIsappoInted that the survey did not cover the entire Chatham development; also queried why another house, across from the proposed geodesic lot, was approved, and does not conform to the Ban Con house styles; contended that the Ban Con house styles were a marketIng strategy, not the City's strategy. Mulcahy stated that the Councl I should be more careful In the future; feels t~e control of house style was not put In place In Chatham as It was In Hunters Park and, recently, In the Lamettl AdditIon. Mulcahy saId he agrees with the neighbors that the geodesic Is not a design that will fIt the area, but feels Hagen has his rights also. Rauenhorst saId she favors the motion; feels the decision to deny Is the sensible one based on the documentation material presented. Woodburn stated he feels the general Idea of zoning applIes here; people had a reasonable Idea, when they purchased theIr homes, of the type of development to expect; feels this Is the type of thing resIdents should be able to expect from their City. MotJon carried (Hicks, Rauenhorst, Woodburn voting In favor of the motIon; ChrIstiansen, Mulcahy voting In opposltlonl. (3-21 Case No. 64-5. Special Use Permit for VeterInary Animal Hospital. 1261 West County Road E - Richard H. Routhe Councl I was referred to Board of Appeals recommendation (3/1/641, PlannIng memo (2/27/641, Engineer's letter (3/5/641 and to PlannIng Commission's recommendations (Minutes of 3/7/641 Miller displayed a transparency of the proposed site; noted that the 2400 square foot veterinary hospital, as proposed, requIres two 10-foot varIances - for the side and rear; feels these varIances are Justifiable based on the hardshIp of restricted use of the property caused by the required 50' setback from two streets for a parcel only 120' x 120'. Miller reported that Board of Appeals and Planning Commission recommend approval of the two setback variances; noted that the Planning Commission recommends approval of a Special Use Permit for the veterinary anImal hospital. Miller referred Council to a letter from Nordby (K.G. Nordby and Assoc- Iates, Inc. I (3/5/641 In response to the contingencIes suggested In the Planning memo (page 31; reported that the sign wIll be moved to conform to the required setbacks; "ServIce and Employee Parking Only" sign wi II be Installed at the north side of the north drIveway, wi II address and adJust planting areas after verIficatIon of the location of N.S.P. underground electrical cables Is receIved. Routhe read a brIef description of how he plans to run the hospital; proposes to name It "Arden Shorevlew Animal HospItal" which Is a facility designed to provide complete health, medical, surgIcal and emergency services to companIon animals. . Normal hours of operation: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 9:00 a.m. to Noon Emergencies on an p.m. - Monday thru - Saturday "on-call" basis Friday Also wI II provide "animal house call servIce" for elderly and handicapped animal owners In the area. Facility wi II provide for boarding of animals. Mulcahy reported that he attended the PlannIng Commission Meeting; feels the Planning Commission was extremely thorough In Its review of the proposal, questioned every aspect.