Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I" ""!"""'~ <br /> ,. '1 <br /> }--, ~ <br /> " .- <br />~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 30 1996 21 <br /> know what the City's regulations are. Three weeks later, she was a resident. Ms. McGuire <br />I advised since that time, she has had architectural drawings prepared for the access. She restated <br /> she purchased the property exclusively with the knowledge that it would support several home <br />I sites and had spoken with staff about the potential value of homes on such a site with mature <br /> trees. <br />I Councilmember Aplikowski asked how the revised plan would impact the development of Ms. <br /> McGuire's land. Ms. McGuire asserted it will reduce the value of the home site on the back of <br /> the property because it will look squarely into the parking lot. <br />I Ms. McGuire stated she has lived on this property since June and since then, has only seen five <br />I or six cars at the Fire Station. She advised she spoke with the ehureh and they have no problem <br /> with shared parking with the Fire Department. Ms. McGuire stated she feels quite strongly about <br /> this and, as a resident, does not believe that any entity should be removed from what law <br />I requires (75 foot setback), She reiterated she was looking for an alternative but that effort has <br /> been misunderstood by the attorney for the Fire Department. <br />I Councilmember Hicks inquired regarding Ms. MeGuire's conversation with staff about the <br /> number of lots that eould be subdivided and suggestion on access. Ms. McGuire responded that <br /> staff suggested requesting an easement from the Fire Department or to pursue sale of land. <br />Ie Councilmember Hicks stated this is an unfortunate situation but there is nothing this Council can' <br /> do relative to negotiating an easement or sale of land with the Fire Department. <br />I Ms. McGuire stated she is not seeking an alternative but to invite the Council to recognize the <br /> law it created which has been broken. <br />I Mayor Probst stated the presumption to further develop is just that, a presumption and it will <br />I have to follow the process. He noted it may be possible but significant issues exist with regard to <br /> access, Mayor Probst eXplained the City is able to consider a setback variance where appropriate <br /> circumstances exist, not breaking or changing a law. <br />I Ms, McGuire suggested that twelve spaees could be loeated with no harm to her property. She <br /> respectfully suggested further consideration be given to other alternatives, including use of the <br />I church parking lot for occasions when overflow parking is needed. <br /> Mr. Ringwald advised that in discussions he had with Ms. McGuire regarding the feasibility of <br />I one additional lot, he referenced possible purchase of the Fire Department property, and stated <br /> the unlikelihood that it would occur. Also, he discussed alternate access points on other property <br /> that exist, aggregating other properties into one larger parcel for development, and other <br />I alternatives such as splitting the property into smaller sections for sale to adjaeent property <br /> owners who have viewed this area as common property. <br />f' With regard to the revised proposal, Mr. Ringwald advised different concepts were discussed <br /> with the Fire Department about ways to minimize impact to adjacent properties, and location of <br />I <br /> ----- ----~ <br />