Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 105 South 5th 5rreet ~I <br /> Box 530 ~^'!J'1fJ..eapolis MN 55440 _. .. <br /> Tel (612) 347.8000 ~S,~ ~ . <br /> . <br /> ~ <br /> I <br /> CP Rail System ~I <br /> Operating Department <br /> Heavy Haul. US <br /> February 7, 1996 I <br /> File: X-PAY-007-80-B I <br /> Richard M. Johnson, P.E. <br /> HNTB Corporation suite 250 I <br /> 3400 W. 66th street, <br /> Minneapolis, MN 55435 <br /> Re: S.P. 62-646-12, Cleveland Ave. Bridge over Railroad <br /> Dear Mr. Johnson: I <br /> This letter is in response to your December 13, 1995 letter I <br /> requesting CP Rail System position on the Cleveland Ave. Project <br /> alternatives "A" thru "C". Alternative A - Existing alignment with replacement of the existing I <br /> bridge. Position: FAVOR. This alternative retains the grade <br /> separation and acceptable horizontal and vertical clearances. It will <br /> enhance public safety and convenience while not affecting railroad <br /> operations. . I <br /> Alternative B - Alignment shifted to the west with replacement of the <br /> existing bridge. Position: NEUTRAL. This alternative has the same <br /> attributes of alt A, but at a higher cost. I <br /> Alternative C - Existing alignment with elimination of the bridge <br /> (At-grade crossing). Position: OPPOSED. <br /> An at grade crossing at this location would greatly increase pUblic I <br /> exposure to the hazards of a train/vehicle collision. It would also <br /> increase the potential for vehicle/vehicle collision as certain I <br /> classes of vehicles are required to stop at RR crossings and these <br /> stops are not always expected by other motorists. <br /> A railroad curve east of the proposed grade crossing would hamper I <br /> motorists view of approaching trains, and train engineers view of <br /> situations at the grade crossing. <br /> The pUblic will experience frequent and sometimes long delays due to I <br /> train blockages. Train activity in this area is fairly active. A 24 <br /> hour period will see 8 to 12 thru trains at up to 40 MPH using this <br /> track. Another 10 to 12 movements per day under the brid~e are made I <br /> in switching movements at very low speeds. Unit coal tra~ns are <br /> operated at very low speeds (due to the sharp curvature of the wye <br /> track) over the crossing twice a day. It is expected that total <br /> train traffic in this area will increase in the future. I <br /> . , <br /> I <br /> .-.-. . <br />