Laserfiche WebLink
<br />j. .. <br />I <br /> <br />I - ~l Senate bill includes tough I <br />\ 'fransportation lease-purchase provision .. <br /> <br /> <br />I funding in Andrea Atherton property entered into before August I, <br />, 1996 to be grandfathered and excluded . <br />S . A proposal that would include from the net debt calculation. Some <br />en ate bIll obligations created by lease-purchase members of the committee expressed <br />agreements for real property in th~ an undcr>tanding of the impact this bill . <br />calculauon of net debt IS makmg Its would have on certain cities, even with <br />The Senate rolled its way through the legislative process. the grandfather provision incorporated. <br />transportation and transit funding H.F. 2941 (Krinkie, R- Shoreview) and The House version of the omnibus <br />proposal into its omnibus tax bill, S.F. 1979 (Stevens. R-Mora) would tax bill does not contain the lease. · <br />which greatly increases the continue to exclude lease-purchase purchase provision. However, the <br />chance that the logjam on this agreements for personal prope11y. original language of the bill, without <br />issue will finally break this year. The bills raise immediate concerns the grandfather provision, is included · <br />The proposal, based on S.F. 832 for smaller cities and cities with lower in the Senate version of the omnibus <br />(Flynn, DFL-Minneapolis), tax bases. If the bill is enacted as tax bill. It is rumored that the final <br />would increase the motor fuels originally drafted, some cities would version will not contain the lease- <br />user fee (gas tax) five cents to find themselves already exceeding the purchase language but those who are · <br />twenty-five cents, index the fee twO percent maximum on net debt. and concerned should contact members of <br />in the future for inflation, other cities would no longer be able to the Senate Tax Comminee immediately. <br />I authorize the Metropolitan utilize lease-purchase agreements for We appreciate the efforts of those cities I <br />Council to impose a general sales real property. who have already called to express the <br />tax of Yz cent in the metro region The house bill was amended in the impact this bill would have on their <br />for transit, repeal the existing taxes committee last week to include communities. 'l' I <br />metro property tax levy for lease-purchase agreements for real <br />transit, and propose changes in <br />the composition of the County <br />State Aid Highway Screening I ' , <br />Board and in the CSAH system I I ~ l'k 1 ? <br />to base funding on lane miles I s property tax relorm now 1 e y. I <br /> <br />rather than center line miles. i Gel <br />The tax committee added the ary ar son <br />proposal on a voice vote, but Despite prognostications that the 1996 legislature would not accomplish <br />deleted the gas tax indexing any major property tax reforms, significant changes may be one step closer I <br />provision on a 9-7 vote. The to reahty. At the Senate tax commIttee meetmg on Tuesday, Senator Doug <br />League supports the Flynn Johnson (DFL-Cook) set aside discussion of the property tax sections of the <br />proposal, including its indexing omnibus tax bill until he could attempt to engineer a compromise among I <br />provision. Senate DFL and Republican members. The committee will reconvene on <br />The House funding pro- Thursday, February 29 to consider the property tax sections of the bill. <br />posal,l-I.F. 2070 (Lieder, DFL- At this time, we have little information on any compromise reform <br />Crookston), is in the House Tax ianguage. However, last week, Senator Johnson outlined a major property I <br />Committee and the House Tax tax reform proposal that could serve as the baSIS for a compromise. HIS <br />Bill as introduced does not proposal would reduce property taxes by expanding the sales tax to clothing. <br />contain any transportation or II l1~e 'proposal would ~O~ify the LOA fot~m~la and add approximately $40 I <br />transit funding proposal. [nllllon to the appropnatlOn as well as ehmmate HACA and expand the <br />Please contact your legisla- I homeowner and renter circuit breaker program. The proposal would also <br />tor and urge their support for ,provide property tax relief to commercial and industrial property owners as I <br />I transportation and transit funding I well as apartmentowners thro~gh class rate changes. Many of the changes <br />this session. 'J! \ would be phased 10 over a peflod of years. The Johnson reforms would also <br />I I reduce school reliance on the property tax by an estimated $380 million. - <br />I. L We'll have to wait for the outcome. \r · <br />L ---- <br />~~ <br />~ <br /> <br />--- -..--------..--- <br />Page 4 LMC Cities Bulletin <br />