Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . I <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 8. 1996 6 .1 <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired what the distance was of the sideyard on the north end of Lot 20. I <br />Mr. Ringwald stated is was approximately 10 feet. <br />Acting Mayor Aplikowski inquired how one lot could be created under one abstract. Mr. I <br />Ringwald replied that an RLS could accomplish that. Mr. Nelson stated a RLS would be <br />approximately $4,000, and would not be willing to pay the additional costs, as the project is I <br />already more than he anticipated. <br />Mr. Ringwald suggested, if the Council is uncomfortable with proceeding, then postpone the I <br />planning case while staff researches to verity if the property has been consolidated. Acting <br />Mayor Apliko\vski stated the Council does not wish to postpone the project, but only wished to <br />clarify the lot divisions. I <br />Mr. Nelson noted the Lot 19 is not a fuIllot, and cannot be built on anyway. He stated he needs I <br />to move forward on the project. <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired what the total square footage of the lot was. Mr. Ringwald stated I <br />it is 15,485, and includes the Lot 19 portion. Councilmember Hicks stated he assumes it is one <br />lot, as R-2 zoning does not allow lot sizes less than 11,000 square feet. <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt PlalUling Case #96-02, .. <br /> Stephen Nelson - Front Yard Setback Variance and Utility and Drainage <br /> Easement Vacation, subject to the conditions as set forth by the PlalUling I <br /> Commission recommendations. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />Mr. Nelson clarified that there will be approximately four hours of lost service during the I <br />sanitary sewer line construction. <br />C. Resolution No. 96-24, Accet;ltin~ Bid and Authorizing Execution of Contract in the I <br /> Matter of the Lift Station #6 Modifications <br />Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent, reviewed for the Council that Lift Station #6 has I <br />been identified for modifications due to its age, type of construction, and safety reasons. He <br />stated proposals were received from three companies; Tri-State Pump and Equipment Company, I <br />Waldor Pump Company, and Quality Flow Systems. Mr. Stafford stated after reviewing the <br />proposals with Mr. Janski, MSA Engineer, Staffrecommends accepting the bid 01'$23,544.50 <br />from Quality Flow Systems. Mr. Stafford stated Tri-State's bid did not include a new concrete I <br />top with aluminum hatch, and Waldor Pump's bid did not include site restoration. Mr. Stafford <br />stated $26,600 has been included in the 1996 budget for this modification. <br /> I <br /> ~I <br /> I <br />