Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I" <br /> I ARDEN HILLS CITY CO! iNCIL - MAY 13. 1996 DR4Fr <br /> .- 3 <br /> Mr. Fritsinger stated that at the April 29, 1996, City Council meeting, the Council Approved <br /> I Resolution Numbers 96-25 and 96-27, relating to the 1996 Street Improvement Project and the <br /> Old Highway 10 Watermain Project. <br /> I Mr. Fritsinger explained that within the two resolutions are statements scheduling the time, date, <br /> and location for the t,vo public hearings related to these projects. He stated that Staff has <br /> clarified the location for the May 28, 1996 meeting must be changed to the New Brighton Family <br /> I Services Center, because of the conflict of the New Brighton City Council using their chambers <br /> for a New Brighton City Council Meeting at that time. <br /> . Mr. Fritsinger stated the City Attorney, Jerry Filla, has recommended the Council first move to <br /> amend Council action taken at the April 29, 1996, meeting to approve the resolution, then move <br /> I to adopt the revised resolutions, stating the correct time and location of the public hearings. <br /> Mayor Probst clarified that the public hearing notices sent contain the correct date, time, and <br /> I location. <br /> MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to amend Resolutions # 96-25 and <br /> .. #96-27, Adopting Resolutions Relating to the Old Highway 10 Watermain and <br /> 1996 Street Improvement Project Assessment Hearings. The motion carried <br /> unanimously (5-0). <br /> I MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to adopt Resolutions #96-25a and <br /> #96-27a, Amending Previously Adopted Resolutions Relating to the Old Highway <br /> . 10 Watermain and 1996 Street Improvement Project Assessment Hearings <br /> Meeting Location. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> I C. Adopt Resolution #96-30. Supportin~ CooDerative Participation in the North Metro <br /> 35W Corridor Coalition <br /> I Mr. Fritsinger stated that City Staff has been meeting with representatives of the cities of <br /> Shoreview, New Brighton, Mounds View and Roseville, for the purpose of discussing issues <br /> I which affect each community and considering alternatives for creating a strategic alliance to <br /> address the issues of the 35W Corridor. <br /> I Mr. Fritsinger stated the issues related to transportation, housing, polluted site clean-up, and <br /> commercial and industrial development. He continued that other topics included GIS, lobbying, <br /> financial assistance, and CDBG funding, and may include broader subjects such as marketing <br /> I development opportunities within the corridor, and the Livable Communities Act. <br /> f' Mr. Fritsinger stated there is no financial commitment to participate in the coalition, and that the <br /> benefit to participating in the coalition is the strength in numbers it provides. <br /> I <br />