My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 07-08-1996
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCP 07-08-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:12:52 PM
Creation date
11/10/2006 3:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(O~'b 5 .. <br />UltiMUSA . <br /> -, <br />The UltiMUSA boundary represents a line surrounding the area which can be served by existing . <br />or planned Metropolitan Council wasteviater facilities. One of the first attempts to define an <br />ultimate service boundary was in 1968. That boundary was based primarily on planned facilities, I <br />new service areas, and estimated populations. In subsequent years, facilities were constructed to <br />serve this estimated increase in population. This BA TC study cites the UtliMUSA in Figure 2, <br />as the area which could be reasonably served by the existing Metropolitan Wastewater I <br />Treatment System. Areas beyond the boundary could be served by new regional systems - <br />separate from the Metro System in place today. I <br />The UltiMUSA is based on the following general criteria and assumptions. I <br />o The UltiMUSA boundary follows watershed boundaries. <br />o If the majority of a community is within the major watershed and regional service I <br />area, the remainder of the community will also be included in the UltiMUSA. .. <br />o Communities currently served outside major watersheds via lift stations and force <br />mains will continue to be served. I <br />o The capacity of the metropolitan sewage disposal system is defined by critical I <br />components or "bottlenecks". A bottleneck is considered to be an incoITectable <br />obstruction. Examples would include a required treatment plant expansion or a major I <br />interceptor reconstruction. The former may be a bottleneck because of regulation <br />constraints and the latter because of economic constraints. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />Executive Summary .. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.