Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ., . <br /> ,t. <br /> Comparable Operating Expenses . <br /> Operating expense categories for arena operation are fairly straight forward with the largest -. <br /> expense category being for personnel to operate and maintain the facility, followed by utilities. <br /> Many of the arena expenses are fixed. not variable. Changes in the level of usage while the <br /> facility is open will not have a dramatic effect on total expenses incurred. . <br /> Schedules of arena revenue .and expense statements are contained in Appendix I for six <br /> facilities. Appendix I also includes the budget proposed by NSC. The first schedule shows the <br /> 1995 actuals and the proposed NSC budget. The second schedule shows the 1996 bUdgets . <br /> for the same arenas and the proposed NSC budget. A final schedule derives averages for the <br /> multiple sheet, year-round facilities shown based on number of sheets of ice and compares <br /> them to the NSC budget. I <br /> Personnel Expense . <br /> The personnel expense (salary plus benefits) projected for the facility includes one full time <br /> manager ($60,000), one assistant manager (35.000), 2 full time supervisors ($30,000 each), 1 <br /> full time and 2 part time clericals ($43,316), and arena attendants (119 part time hours per . <br /> week on 3 and 4 person shifts). Additional administrative staff time is provided through the <br /> charge for administrative overhead. <br /> The rates for services are consistent with area salaries for similar positions. These salaries . <br /> can be found in Appendix II. <br /> ,.~; '. The revenue projections are based on the arena being operated 10,400 hours per year. .. <br /> Staffing philosophies vary among managers on how many people should be available per rink. <br /> The staffing levels suggested provide for a combined level of management and rink attendants <br /> of 3 FTE's at all times the rinks are open. plus the clerical help. We are also assuming that . <br /> since no concession revenues are recognized, that any staff needed to manage that portion of <br /> the operation would be funded directly by MASC. Staffing at the Bloomington ar.ena provides <br /> for 3 employees early in the day and late at night. During a game or other times when the I <br /> arena is fully operational, 10 employees are scheduled at the Bloomington rink. The difference <br /> between the Bloomington staffing levels and the NSC staffing levels is attributed to the four <br /> rink configuration which has one entry point and clear site lines from a central location to all <br /> areas of ice. . <br /> Other Expenses . <br /> Precise comparisons to other facilities is impossible, however, comparing a proration of the <br /> costs for the facilities shown suggests that the per sheet expense levels proposed for the NSC . <br /> facility are under the per sheet expense levels for the multiple sheet arenas listed. Direct <br /> comparisons by line items are difficult due to differences in facilities and the way in which <br /> expenses are recorded. In a number of categories, it is not appropriate to use a prorated <br /> expense level. The nature of the facility and its newness should cause initial operating costs . <br /> to be lower than those of existing facilities. Additionally, start-up costs should be offset by <br /> warrantees in place for the first year. An adjusted budget for the facility is contained in <br /> Appendix 1-c, the third schedule of Appendix I. Appendix 1-c shows budget and actual I <br /> averages for the multiple sheet facilities, a per sheet proration times four, an adjusted budget, <br /> and a comparison of the adjusted budget to the proposed NSC budget. <br /> No expenses for concessions, pro shop, skate school, officials or instructors have been e. <br /> included. These activities will be run by NSC and all expenses and income will go to NSC. <br /> DRAFT REPORT 5/30/96 Page 1 I <br />