Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> . <br /> .e <br /> I <br /> FRIDAY,JULY [2. 1996 SAINT PAUL PIONEER PRESS <br /> I REGION <br /> l::'~m~~ars backing US West against city fees <br /> us West. West of the Redwood Falls deci. phone companies to resolve those <br /> I appealed to agency "It's been our position that mu- sian, he said, issues." . <br /> nicipalities should not charge "It's very reasonahle to expect Crawford said he knows of no <br /> after suit dismissed those franchise fees," he said. "To municipalities should have the au- community that sees franchise <br /> ensure the provision of phone ser- thority to tell companies where fees as a cash cow: They're just <br /> MARTIN J. MOYLAN STAFF WRITER vice at fair and reasonable rates, and when they can install infra- looking at them as ways to more <br /> we need to assure rights of way structure," Sampsel said. "But fully recover costs associated with <br /> are available and unimpeded." moving into franchise fees is utilities tearing up puhlic ways, he <br /> he state Public Utilities Com- And franchise fees could he an something else." said. <br /> mission and Public Service De- impediment, he said. David Crawford, an attorney US West attorney Dave Seykora <br /> partment appear ready to back US He noted that utility companies representing the League of Minne. said Minnesota law gives the PUC <br /> I_assertion that some cities must hear the cost of tearing up sota Cities, said the squabble in. exclusive authori.ty over the iran. <br /> ns have tried to usurp the and restoring streets when they valves much more than franchise chising of phone companies and <br /> '. regulatory authority over fees, however. <br /> local phone companies. perform work. "It's a question of a city's abili- the setting of terms and conditions <br /> I The most noteworthy example David Sampsel, Public Service ty toset certain reasonahle stan- for construction and service deliv- <br /> a Redwood Falls ordinance that Department spokesman, said any dards." he said. "We believe a city ery. <br /> t a franchise fee of 2.6 cents per additional, charge communities as- has the authority to do that. And "We have encountered situations <br /> foot per year on new fiber-optic sess phone companies would likely it's closer to the citizens and with a few municipalities where <br /> lone cable laid beneath public he passed on to customers. In ef- knows what thev need." an ordinance or proposed ordi- <br /> hts of way. feet, it would be a tax, he said. With the deregulation of the nance seemed to go into an area of <br /> US West had challenged the fee "If they use franchise fees for telecommunication industry, many the PUC's jurisdiction," he said. <br /> In Redwood County District Court, general funds, they're burying a communities fear they'll he inun- "What we're dealing with in Red- <br /> but its suit was dismissed in May. tax increase in people's telephone dated with requests to tear up wood Falls is a principle. ... It's a <br /> I appealed to the PUC, saying bills/t he said, . their streets again and again to small fee today but may be a <br /> dwood Falls was dealing with He said state law does not sup- install new communication 8Y8- much larger fee tomorrow." <br /> issue within the pue's domain. port municipalities assessing iran- terns, he said. He added that it would be very <br /> PUC spokesman Jim Pepe indi- chise fees from phone companies. "Thnse are the kinds of things difficult to plan and huild a phone <br /> led Thursday that the commis- And the Public Service Depart- cities are very concerned about," network if US West had to cope <br /> n will issue an order within a ment is considering filing a brief Crawford said. "We're hoping we with a hodgepodge of different <br /> . weeks that effectively backs supporting any legal appeal hy US can work with US West and other regulations in each community. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> .. <br /> I <br />