Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I DRAFT <br />~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8 1996 5 <br />I Council member Hicks noted McCracken Lane is not being resurfaced all the way to Chatham <br />I A venue and suggested staff be asked to present a recommendation at the next meeting. He stated <br /> that while he is sympathetic to Mr. Schmidt's request, the Council is in a position where it can no <br /> longer adjust other assessments to cover the adjustment being requested by Mr. Schmidt. <br />I Mr. Fritsinger advised the assessment policy has been consistently applied with other comer lots <br /> for a number of years. The assessment for Mr. Schmidt's property is based on this policy and <br />I any change would be not consistent with the policy. If the Council desires to revisit this issue, he <br /> suggested they consider a specific motion. Mr. Fritsinger noted a special meeting has been <br /> scheduled on July 15, 1996, and this request for adjustment could be considered at that time. <br />. Also, the Council could extend Mr. Schmidt's appeal date for one week so it can be considered at <br /> that time. <br />I MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Hicks seconded a motion to table consideration ofMr. <br /> Schmidt's request for an assessment adjustment to the special Council meeting of <br />I July 15, 1996 and to extend Mr. Schmidt's appeal deadline to July 17, 1996. <br /> Councilmember Malone stated he would support the motion on the floor to allow further <br />.. discussion. <br /> The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />I There were no other public comments. <br />. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Planning Case #96-05, Control Data PUD, 4201 North Lexington Avenue <br />I Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, advised that Control Data Systems (CDS) <br />I is requesting approval of a PUD Master Plan and a Preliminary Minor Subdivision to facilitate <br /> the potential sale of the building and property adjacent to 4290 Lexington Avenue (originally the <br /> DynaMark building). Mr. Ringwald reviewed a site plan of the property and commented on <br />I staffs review of each of the three parcels relating to building and parking areas. <br /> Mr. Ringwald provided more detail regarding Area I and reviewed the Parks and Recreation <br />I Commission recommendation for continued use of the parking area so it is in close proximity to <br /> Cummings Park. They also recommend the dedication of the westerly 100 feet of the wooded <br /> area. Staff recommends they be allowed to develop up to the easterly 25 feet of the wooded lot <br />I which is 200 feet wide, but that a 25 to 50 foot setback would only be acceptable with review to <br /> assure adequate low level screening and buffering. <br />it <br />I <br />