Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 14, 1989 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />CASE #88-36 (Cont'd) <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone questioned the requested sign <br />variance; indicated there was no information in the <br />planning packet. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Bergly advised the sign location was not identified when the revised site plan <br />was submitted; the applicant has since submitted the site drawing with the sign <br />location. He explained the sign is located 10 ft. from the County Road E-2 and <br />Cleveland Avenue right-of-ways. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone stated the spirit of the Sign Ordinance is to keep signs off <br />the right-of-ways in the city; agreed this is an unusually large right-of-way. He <br />questioned if the applicant would consider moving the sign if the County were to <br />utilize the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Hagen stated he would move the sign as snow storage would become a problem if the <br />right-of-way were utilized for improvement of the road. He noted the site <br />topography limits locations for the sign and if the right-of-way was reduced the <br />sign would have to be placed in the parking lot area or closer to the building. <br /> <br />There was discussion relative to placing an expiration date on the variance in <br />the event the right-of-way were utilized by the County. <br /> <br />Attorney Filla commented the sign may become a visual obstruction for traffic if <br />the roadways were expanded to include the right-of-ways; conditions placed on the <br />variance approval would be appropriate in this case. <br /> <br />Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, that Council approve <br />the requested 15 foot Sign Setback Variance from both County Road E-2 and <br />Cleveland Avenue, Case #88-36, Hans Hagen Corporate Headquarters, based on the <br />following: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. The unique right-of-way situation poses a hardship and the siting of the <br />sign, with the variances, will be consistent with ordinance requirementse <br />2. The variance will expire should Ramsey County reconstruct the intersection so <br />as to increase the roadway surface to the existing right-of-way line. <br /> <br />Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />REQ. PURCHASE; <br />1989 TRUCK, <br />PARK DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorandum from Park Director <br />Buckley dated 8-11-89, requesting authorization for <br />purchase of 1989 3/4 ton pickup truck for use by the <br />Park Department. <br /> <br />Buckley reported on the price quotes received from several dealerships in the <br />metropolitan area and explained the quotes received on either of the two vehicles <br />he recommends for purchase are $2,616.00 over the budgeted amount. He suggested <br />the excess funds be utilized from the sale of two used vehicles and the savings <br />balance from the recent purchase of the public works water van. <br /> <br />Council questioned if Buckley would be requesting funds for the purchase of a <br />snowplow for this vehicle and what the cost would be. <br /> <br />Buckley advised he would transfer the snowplow from the current 3/4 ton truck <br />when it is sold if the plow is in good condition; a new plow would be <br />approximately $1,500.00. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone questioned if the excess monies saved from the purchase of <br />the water van can be utilized for this purchase, since the monies are directly <br />related to the utility fund. He also asked if the vehicle would be painted green. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator Berger advised the monies could not be utilized from the <br />utility funds; suggested he could meet with Buckley and Lund to identify any <br />excess funds in the budget which could be utilized toward_this purchase. <br />